Article3 Biotech2021
Bioinoculation using indigenous
Article in 3 Biotech, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular pathways in plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria-plant interactions: a comprehensive review.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- Zeolite-amended peat carriers improve long-term survival ofAIMS microbiology · 2026Article
- Enhancing maize yield and antioxidant capacity with glyphosate-resilient rhizobacteria in glyphosate contaminated soil.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Improving Sugarcane Biomass and Phosphorus Fertilization Through Phosphate-Solubilizing Bacteria: A Photosynthesis-Based Approach.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Bionanotechnology in Agriculture: A One Health Approach.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Synergistic impact of nanomaterials and plant probiotics in agriculture: A tale of two-way strategy for long-term sustainability.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Review
- Biopesticides as a promising alternative to synthetic pesticides: A case for microbial pesticides, phytopesticides, and nanobiopesticides.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Review
- Endophytes and their potential in biotic stress management and crop production.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Review
- Impact of nanophos in agriculture to improve functional bacterial community and crop productivity.BMC plant biology · 2021Article
- Impact of nanochitosan and3 Biotech · 2021Article
- Article
- Constraints and Prospects of Improving Cowpea Productivity to Ensure Food, Nutritional Security and Environmental Sustainability.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bio-inoculants play an important role for sustainable agriculture. Application of nanocompounds in the agriculture sector provides strength and is reported to enhance crop production but the combined effect of nanocompounds and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on plants has not been studied much. Therefore, the present study was planned to observe the effect of two plant growth promotory SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13205-020-02561-2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.