Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33442487›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of MCH and AIDS2021

Utilization of Rapid Diagnostic Testing in sub-Saharan Africa: Challenges and Effects on HIV Prevention.

Elizabeth Armstrong-Mensah, Ato Kwamena Tetteh, Seung Choi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of MCH and AIDS, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.0field-weighted citation impact, top 57% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. HIV Diagnostics and Vaccines: It Takes Two to Tango.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elizabeth Armstrong-MensahSchool of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia 30303, USA.
Ato Kwamena TettehSchool of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia 30303, USA.
Seung ChoiSchool of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia 30303, USA.
Georgia State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) remains a global threat to health. To prevent and control the disease caused by the virus, developed and developing countries continue to invest heavily in research and equipment so as to accurately detect the virus. The utilization of highly sensitive and effective rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) have the potential to detect HIV in high-burden countries, especially those in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Yet, in SSA, challenges associated with HIV-RDT result inaccuracy, HIV misdiagnosis, poor tester capacity, and the improper storage of HIV-RDT kits have negatively impacted the benefits, and threaten to undermine HIV prevention. This paper focuses on the utilization of RDTs in HIV diagnosis in SSA, HIV-RDT challenges, and the effects of HIV-RDT challenges on HIV prevention. Subsequent to reviewing available literature, the authors found that although HIV-RDTs can negatively impact HIV-prevention efforts in SSA due to the likelihood of false positive HIV diagnoses, they generally provide quick results for people in resource poor settings, and do not require them to return to the testing sites to obtain their results. Obtaining accurate rapid HIV results means people who test positive can immediately seek care and take steps to prevent future transmission of the virus.

Indexed as

HIVHIV preventionRapid HIV testingSub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID33442487
PMCPMC7792746
OpenAlexW3118425385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.