Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33442468›Full record

ArticleToxicology research2020

Justification for species selection for pharmaceutical toxicity studies.

Helen Prior, Richard Haworth, Briony Labram, Ruth Roberts, Alison Wolfreys, Fiona Sewell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicology research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Helen PriorNational Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs), 215 Euston Rd, London, NW1 2BE, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8700-7226
Richard HaworthGlaxoSmithKline R&D, Park Road, Ware, SG12 0DP, UK.
Briony LabramNational Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs), 215 Euston Rd, London, NW1 2BE, UK.
Ruth RobertsApconiX, Alderley Park, Alderley Edge, SK10 4TG, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7763-7558
Alison WolfreysUCB Biopharma, Bath Rd, Slough, SL1 3WE, UK.
Fiona SewellNational Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs), 215 Euston Rd, London, NW1 2BE, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Toxicity studies using mammalian species are generally required to provide safety data to support clinical development and licencing registration for potential new pharmaceuticals. International regulatory guidelines outline recommendations for the order (rodent and/or non-rodent) and number of species, retaining flexibility for development of a diverse range of drug modalities in a manner relevant for each specific new medicine. Selection of the appropriate toxicology species involves consideration of scientific, ethical and practical factors, with individual companies likely having different perspectives and preferences regarding weighting of various aspects dependent upon molecule characteristics and previous experience of specific targets or molecule classes. This article summarizes presentations from a symposium at the 2019 Annual Congress of the British Toxicology Society on the topic of species selection for pharmaceutical toxicity studies. This symposium included an overview of results from a National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs) and Association of British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI) international collaboration that reviewed the use of one or two species in regulatory toxicology studies and justification for the species selected within each programme. Perspectives from two pharmaceutical companies described their processes for species selection for evaluation of biologics, and justification for selection of the minipig as a toxicological species for small molecules. This article summarizes discussions on the scientific justification and other considerations taken into account to ensure the most appropriate animal species are used for toxicity studies to meet regulatory requirements and to provide the most value for informing project decisions.

Indexed as

3Rsdogdrug developmentminipignon-rodentratrodentsafety assessmenttoxicology

Identifiers

PMID33442468
PMCPMC7786171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.