ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2021
Outcomes of Corneal Topography among Progressive Keratoconus Patients 12 months following Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Digital transformation of care for keratoconus patients: ML modeling structural outcomes of corneal collagen cross-linking.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Quantifying choroidal and retinal thicknesses variations via optical coherence tomography in different stages of pediatric keratoconus.BMC ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Outcomes of Corneal Topographical Kmax readings 3 months after Corneal Cross Linkage in Keratoconus patients.Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives · 2022Article
- The 25th Anniversary of Laser Vision Correction in the United States.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to assess the overall and specific topographic changes among patients who underwent corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) due to progressive keratoconus.
methodsThis retrospective case series study was conducted at a single-arm hospital in King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh. All progressive keratoconus patients who underwent CXL between January 2017 and December 2018 were included consecutively. The epi-off crosslinking technique (Dresden protocol) was applied in all patients. The topographic values were measured preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively. Patients with a history of a previous corneal procedure, corneal trauma, or any corneal scarring were excluded.
resultsAmong our population (29 eyes of 24 patients), 58.6% of eyes were for male patients, and the mean age of the population was 27.76 ± 4.21 years. Based on the topography results, the mean values of corneal thickness at central 3 mm decreased from 473.45 ± 38 µm to 465.72 ± 41.78 µm following CXL (Z = -1.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.048-0.057, p= 0.053). Clinically significant astigmatism measurements were present in 28 (96.6%) eyes before CXL compared to 26 (89.7%) eyes after CXL. The mean values of astigmatism among the patients were 3.37 ± 2.25 diopters before and 3.67 ± 2.61 diopters after CXL (Z = -1696, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.085-0.096, p = 0.09). After CXL, the mean values of the front elevation at the apex changed from 33.90 ± 20.13 µm to 36.10 ± 21.09 µm (Z = -2.792, 95% [CI] = 0.003-0.006, p = 0.005). The mean values of the back elevation at the apex changed from 68.4 ± 35.66 µm to 69.90 ± 35.89 µm (Z = -0.934, 95% CI = 0.343-0.366, p = 0.35).
conclusionThe topographic corneal parameters improved significantly in the patients with corneal ectasia after CXL. These results revealed the safety and efficacy of CXL in stabilizing keratoconus progression among Saudi patients at 1 year of follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.