Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33442226›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2021

Referral Process in Patients with Uveitis: A Challenge in the Health System.

Alejandra Villalobos-Pérez, Juliana Reyes-Guanes, Juliana Muñoz-Ortiz, María Andrea Estévez-Florez, Mario Ramos-Santodomingo, Valentina Balaguera-Orjuela, Alejandra de-la-Torre

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Clinical patterns and risk factors in scleritis: a multicentric study in Colombia.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alejandra Villalobos-Pérez *Universidad del Norte, Barranquilla, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0003-2858-4223
Juliana Reyes-Guanes *Escuela Barraquer. Research Group, Escuela Superior de Oftalmología del Instituto Barraquer de América, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-2326-7213
Juliana Muñoz-OrtizEscuela Barraquer. Research Group, Escuela Superior de Oftalmología del Instituto Barraquer de América, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-9894-9323
María Andrea Estévez-FlorezResearch Group in Neuroscience NeURos, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-3341-9073
Mario Ramos-SantodomingoResearch Group in Neuroscience NeURos, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-7552-3963
Valentina Balaguera-OrjuelaResearch Group in Neuroscience NeURos, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia.
Alejandra de-la-TorreResearch Group in Neuroscience NeURos, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0003-0684-1989
Universidad del Rosario · COInstituto Barraquer de América · COUniversidad del Norte · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo describe the evaluation and referral process from a group of patients with uveitis presented at a specialized uveitis center in Bogotá, Colombia.

methodsAn observational descriptive cross-sectional study was performed. After applying the selection criteria, 315 clinical records were recovered. Univariate and bivariate analyses were used, reporting proportions, means and standard deviations.

resultsThe mean age of the sample was 45.23 years old and 63.8% of them were females. Patients were mostly referred by retina specialists, general ophthalmologists, rheumatologists, and cornea specialists. Meantime between the first ocular symptom and uveitis specialist evaluation was 2.08 years. Patients had been previously evaluated by a mean of 1.9 ophthalmologists. In 79.9% of patients, inflammation was recognized by the remittent; however, only 4.7% of patients were correctly graded according to SUN classification. At first time consultation with the uvea specialist, 52.1% of the patients arrived with an adequate infectious panel, 58.1% with an adequate rheumatologic panel, 11.6% with aqueous humor PCR study, 65.1% with an initial etiological diagnosis, 34.9% with inadequate topical treatment, and 59.6% with inadequate systemic treatment. The mean time to reach a diagnosis by the uvea specialist was 5.27 weeks (0.10 years). A diagnostic coincidence was not reached in 58.7% of the cases.

conclusionThe referral process to uveitis specialists is complex but highly relevant for those who suffer from this pathology. Health professionals must be aware of the standardized classification of the disease, the appropriate treatment according to the classification, and early referral to the uveologist with adequate laboratory tests.

Indexed as

Colombiadiagnosisdisease managementophthalmologistsreferral and consultationuveitis

Identifiers

PMID33442226
PMCPMC7797337
OpenAlexW3119239076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.