ArticleNature2021
Dire wolves were the last of an ancient New World canid lineage.
Article in Nature, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- One Embryology: impactful connections between human- and wildlife-assisted reproduction.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Review
- On the ancestry and evolution of the extinct dire wolf.Cell genomics · 2026Article
- Emerging trends in genome editing of wild animals.Transgenic research · 2026Review
- De-extinction: how reviving the past is revolutionizing the future of conservation biology.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2026Review
- Ecological Inference From Isolated Vertebrae: Evaluating Functional Signal Across the Carnivoran Spine.Journal of morphology · 2026Article
- Commentary: The missing sabertooth baculum-At what point might the absence of evidence reasonably be considered evidence of absence?Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007) · 2025Article
- Reviving the Dire Wolf? A Case Study in Welfare Ethics, Legal Gaps, and Ontological Ambiguity.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- An update onPeerJ · 2025Article
- Mammoth featured heavily in Western Clovis diet.Science advances · 2024Article
- Fast Bayesian Inference of Phylogenies from Multiple Continuous Characters.Systematic biology · 2024Article
- Virtual reconstruction of the Canis arnensis type (Canidae, Mammalia) from the Upper Valdarno Basin (Italy, Early Pleistocene).Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The history of Coast Salish "woolly dogs" revealed by ancient genomics and Indigenous Knowledge.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- Incongruence in the phylogenomics era.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2023Review
- The earliest Ethiopian wolf: implications for the species evolution and its future survival.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Tracing Eastern Wolf Origins From Whole-Genome Data in Context of Extensive Hybridization.Molecular biology and evolution · 2023Article
- Divergence and introgression among theEvolution letters · 2022Article
- A morphological analysis of carnivoran ossicles from Rancho La Brea.Journal of morphology · 2022Article
- Comparative genomics uncovers the evolutionary history, demography, and molecular adaptations of South American canids.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- A Plea for a New Synthesis: From Twentieth-Century Paleobiology to Twenty-First-Century Paleontology and Back Again.Biology · 2022Article
- Genome Sequencing of a Gray Wolf from Peninsular India Provides New Insights into the Evolution and Hybridization of Gray Wolves.Genome biology and evolution · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
49 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dire wolves are considered to be one of the most common and widespread large carnivores in Pleistocene America
Indexed as
Identifiers
33442059What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.