Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33441958›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Non-disruptive uptake of anionic and cationic gold nanoparticles in neutral zwitterionic membranes.

Ester Canepa, Sebastian Salassi, Federica Simonelli, Riccardo Ferrando, Ranieri Rolandi, Chiara Lambruschini, Fabio Canepa, Silvia Dante, Annalisa Relini, Giulia Rossi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ester CanepaDepartment of Chemistry and Industrial Chemistry, University of Genoa, 16146, Genoa, Italy.
Sebastian SalassiDepartment of Physics, University of Genoa, 16146, Genoa, Italy.
Federica SimonelliDepartment of Physics, University of Genoa, 16146, Genoa, Italy.
Riccardo FerrandoDepartment of Physics, University of Genoa, 16146, Genoa, Italy.
Ranieri RolandiDepartment of Physics, University of Genoa, 16146, Genoa, Italy.
Chiara LambruschiniDepartment of Chemistry and Industrial Chemistry, University of Genoa, 16146, Genoa, Italy.
Fabio CanepaDepartment of Chemistry and Industrial Chemistry, University of Genoa, 16146, Genoa, Italy.
Silvia DanteMaterials Characterization Facility, Italian Institute of Technology, 16163, Genoa, Italy.
Annalisa ReliniDepartment of Physics, University of Genoa, 16146, Genoa, Italy. relini@fisica.unige.it.
Giulia RossiDepartment of Physics, University of Genoa, 16146, Genoa, Italy. rossig@fisica.unige.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The potential toxicity of ligand-protected nanoparticles (NPs) on biological targets is crucial for their clinical translation. A number of studies are aimed at investigating the molecular mechanisms shaping the interactions between synthetic NPs and neutral plasma membranes. The role played by the NP surface charge is still widely debated. We compare, via liposome leakage assays, the perturbation induced by the penetration of sub-6 nm anionic and cationic Au NPs into model neutral lipid membranes composed of the zwitterionic 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (POPC). Our charged Au NPs are functionalized by a mixture of the apolar 1-octanethiol and a ω-charged thiol which is either the anionic 11-mercapto-1-undecanesulfonate or the cationic (11-mercaptoundecyl)-N,N,N-trimethylammonium. In both cases, the NP uptake in the bilayer is confirmed by quartz crystal microbalance investigations. Our leakage assays show that both negatively and positively charged Au NPs do not induce significant membrane damage on POPC liposomes when penetrating into the bilayer. By means of molecular dynamics simulations, we show that the energy barrier for membrane penetration is the same for both NPs. These results suggest that the sign of the NP surface charge, per se, does not imply different physicochemical mechanisms of interaction with zwitterionic lipid membranes.

Identifiers

PMID33441958
PMCPMC7807088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.