Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33441840›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Circulating tumor DNA is detectable in canine histiocytic sarcoma, oral malignant melanoma, and multicentric lymphoma.

Anaïs Prouteau, Jérôme Alexandre Denis, Pauline De Fornel, Edouard Cadieu, Thomas Derrien, Camille Kergal, Nadine Botherel, Ronan Ulvé, Mélanie Rault, Amira Bouzidi and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Beyond the Needle: Is Liquid Biopsy the Future of Veterinary Medicine?International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Safety and Feasibility of InfusingbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review of Molecular Technologies for Investigating Canine Cancer.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  14. Melanoma of the dog and cat: consensus and guidelines.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Anaïs ProuteauUniv Rennes, CNRS, IGDR (Institut de génétique et développement de Rennes) UMR6290, 35000, Rennes, France.
Jérôme Alexandre DenisSorbonne University, Paris, France.
Pauline De FornelMicen Vet, Créteil, France.
Edouard CadieuUniv Rennes, CNRS, IGDR (Institut de génétique et développement de Rennes) UMR6290, 35000, Rennes, France.
Thomas DerrienUniv Rennes, CNRS, IGDR (Institut de génétique et développement de Rennes) UMR6290, 35000, Rennes, France.
Camille KergalUniv Rennes, CNRS, IGDR (Institut de génétique et développement de Rennes) UMR6290, 35000, Rennes, France.
Nadine BotherelUniv Rennes, CNRS, IGDR (Institut de génétique et développement de Rennes) UMR6290, 35000, Rennes, France.
Ronan UlvéUniv Rennes, CNRS, IGDR (Institut de génétique et développement de Rennes) UMR6290, 35000, Rennes, France.
Mélanie RaultUniv Rennes, CNRS, IGDR (Institut de génétique et développement de Rennes) UMR6290, 35000, Rennes, France.
Amira BouzidiSorbonne University, Paris, France.
Romain FrançoisMicen Vet, Créteil, France.
Laetitia DorsoDepartment of Biology, Pathology and Food Sciences, Oniris, Laboniris, Nantes, France.
Alexandra LespagnolLaboratory of Somatic Genetic of Cancers, Hospital of Rennes, Rennes, France.
Patrick DevauchelleMicen Vet, Créteil, France.
Jérôme AbadieDepartment of Biology, Pathology and Food Sciences, Oniris, Laboniris, Nantes, France.
Catherine AndréUniv Rennes, CNRS, IGDR (Institut de génétique et développement de Rennes) UMR6290, 35000, Rennes, France.
Benoît HédanUniv Rennes, CNRS, IGDR (Institut de génétique et développement de Rennes) UMR6290, 35000, Rennes, France. benoit.hedan@univ-rennes1.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has become an attractive biomarker in human oncology, and its use may be informative in canine cancer. Thus, we used droplet digital PCR or PCR for antigen receptor rearrangement, to explore tumor-specific point mutations, copy number alterations, and chromosomal rearrangements in the plasma of cancer-affected dogs. We detected ctDNA in 21/23 (91.3%) of histiocytic sarcoma (HS), 2/8 (25%) of oral melanoma, and 12/13 (92.3%) of lymphoma cases. The utility of ctDNA in diagnosing HS was explored in 133 dogs, including 49 with HS, and the screening of recurrent PTPN11 mutations in plasma had a specificity of 98.8% and a sensitivity between 42.8 and 77% according to the clinical presentation of HS. Sensitivity was greater in visceral forms and especially related to pulmonary location. Follow-up of four dogs by targeting lymphoma-specific antigen receptor rearrangement in plasma showed that minimal residual disease detection was concordant with clinical evaluation and treatment response. Thus, our study shows that ctDNA is detectable in the plasma of cancer-affected dogs and is a promising biomarker for diagnosis and clinical follow-up. ctDNA detection appears to be useful in comparative oncology research due to growing interest in the study of natural canine tumors and exploration of new therapies.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNADNA Copy Number VariationsDog DiseasesDogsFemaleHistiocytic SarcomaLymphomaMaleMelanomaMouth NeoplasmsMutationProtein Tyrosine Phosphatase, Non-Receptor Type 11Sensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAProtein Tyrosine Phosphatase, Non-Receptor Type 11

Identifiers

PMID33441840
PMCPMC7806858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.