ArticleScientific reports2021
Quantitative immuno-mass spectrometry imaging of skeletal muscle dystrophin.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhancing the Sensitivity of Mass Spectrometry Imaging through Spatial Signal Averaging.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2026Article
- Elemental mass spectrometry imaging of biomolecules using metal-conjugated probes.Nature reviews. Chemistry · 2025Review
- Proteomic Profiling Towards a Better Understanding of Genetic Based Muscular Diseases: The Current Picture and a Look to the Future.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Mass spectrometry imaging for unearthing and validating quality markers in traditional Chinese medicines.Chinese herbal medicines · 2025Review
- Quantitative distribution of essential elements and non-essential metals in breast cancer tissues by LA-ICP-TOF-MS.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Improvement in the sensitivity of LA-ICP-MS bioimaging by addition of nitrogen to the argon carrier gas.Journal of analytical atomic spectrometry · 2024Article
- Immunolabelling perturbs the endogenous and antibody-conjugated elemental concentrations during immuno-mass spectrometry imaging.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2024Article
- Spatial distribution of trace metals and associated transport proteins during bacterial infection.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2024Article
- Mass Spectrometry Imaging Spatial Tissue Analysis toward Personalized Medicine.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- High-Throughput Digital Image Analysis Reveals Distinct Patterns of Dystrophin Expression in Dystrophinopathy Patients.Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology · 2021Article
- Assessing the reproducibility of labelled antibody binding in quantitative multiplexed immuno-mass spectrometry imaging.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Emerging and promising therapeutic interventions for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) are confounded by the challenges of quantifying dystrophin. Current approaches have poor precision, require large amounts of tissue, and are difficult to standardize. This paper presents an immuno-mass spectrometry imaging method using gadolinium (Gd)-labeled anti-dystrophin antibodies and laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry to simultaneously quantify and localize dystrophin in muscle sections. Gd is quantified as a proxy for the relative expression of dystrophin and was validated in murine and human skeletal muscle sections following k-means clustering segmentation, before application to DMD patients with different gene mutations where dystrophin expression was measured up to 100 µg kg
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.