Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33441822›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Classification and specific primer design for accurate detection of SARS-CoV-2 using deep learning.

Alejandro Lopez-Rincon, Alberto Tonda, Lucero Mendoza-Maldonado, Daphne G J C Mulders, Richard Molenkamp, Carmina A Perez-Romero, Eric Claassen, Johan Garssen, Aletta D Kraneveld

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Alejandro Lopez-RinconDivision of Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 99, 3584 CG, Utrecht, The Netherlands. a.lopezrincon@uu.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4491-5889
Alberto TondaUMR 518 MIA-Paris, INRAE, c/o 113 rue Nationale, 75103, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5895-4809
Lucero Mendoza-MaldonadoHospital Civil de Guadalajara "Dr. Juan I. Menchaca", Salvador Quevedo y Zubieta 750, Independencia Oriente, C.P. 44340, Guadalajara, Jalisco, México.
Daphne G J C MuldersDepartment of Viroscience, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Richard MolenkampDepartment of Viroscience, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Carmina A Perez-RomeroDepartamento de Investigación, Universidad Central de Queretaro (UNICEQ), Av. 5 de Febrero 1602, San Pablo, 76130, Santiago de Querétaro, QRO, Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1696-4368
Eric ClaassenAthena Institute, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Johan GarssenDivision of Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 99, 3584 CG, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Aletta D KraneveldDivision of Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 99, 3584 CG, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Utrecht University · NLErasmus MC · NLHospital Civil de Guadalajara · MXInstitut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · FRVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, deep learning is coupled with explainable artificial intelligence techniques for the discovery of representative genomic sequences in SARS-CoV-2. A convolutional neural network classifier is first trained on 553 sequences from the National Genomics Data Center repository, separating the genome of different virus strains from the Coronavirus family with 98.73% accuracy. The network's behavior is then analyzed, to discover sequences used by the model to identify SARS-CoV-2, ultimately uncovering sequences exclusive to it. The discovered sequences are validated on samples from the National Center for Biotechnology Information and Global Initiative on Sharing All Influenza Data repositories, and are proven to be able to separate SARS-CoV-2 from different virus strains with near-perfect accuracy. Next, one of the sequences is selected to generate a primer set, and tested against other state-of-the-art primer sets, obtaining competitive results. Finally, the primer is synthesized and tested on patient samples (n = 6 previously tested positive), delivering a sensitivity similar to routine diagnostic methods, and 100% specificity. The proposed methodology has a substantial added value over existing methods, as it is able to both automatically identify promising primer sets for a virus from a limited amount of data, and deliver effective results in a minimal amount of time. Considering the possibility of future pandemics, these characteristics are invaluable to promptly create specific detection methods for diagnostics.

Indexed as

Deep LearningLimit of DetectionDNA PrimersPolymerase Chain ReactionSARS-CoV-2DNA Primers

Identifiers

PMID33441822
PMCPMC7806918
OpenAlexW3120505451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.