ArticleScientific reports2021
Characterization and comparative analysis among plastome sequences of eight endemic Rubus (Rosaceae) species in Taiwan.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative plastome analysis and plastomic phylogeny of Moraceae with expanded species-level sampling.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Chloroplast genome comparison, phylogeny, and molecular evolution of five endemic Potentilla (Rosaceae) species in Mongolia.Genetica · 2026Article
- Plastome evolution and phylogenomics of Glycine (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae).BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Comparative genomics on chloroplasts of ChineseFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- The Taihangia mitogenome provides new insights into its adaptation and organelle genome evolution in Rosaceae.Planta · 2025Article
- Characteristics and phylogenetic analysis of the complete chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2025Article
- Chloroplast Genome Provides Insights into Molecular Evolution and Species Relationship of Fleabanes (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Characteristics and phylogenetic analysis of the complete chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2023Article
- Complete chloroplast genome sequence of Lens ervoides and comparison to Lens culinaris.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Plastid genome evolution of a monophyletic group in the subtribe Lauriineae (Laureae, Lauraceae).Plant diversity · 2022Article
- Infrageneric Plastid Genomes ofGenes · 2022Article
- Complete chloroplast genomes of Rubus species (Rosaceae) and comparative analysis within the genus.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- Characterization of the plastome ofPhytoKeys · 2022Article
- Comparative chloroplast genome analysis ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Plastome Characterization and Phylogenomic Analysis Yield New Insights into the Evolutionary Relationships among the Species of the SubgenusPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- A Review on Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Applications on Anthocyanin and Ellagitannin Metabolites of Blackberries and Raspberries.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Diversity and authentication ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genus Rubus represents the second largest genus of the family Rosaceae in Taiwan, with 41 currently recognized species across three subgenera (Chamaebatus, Idaoeobatus, and Malochobatus). Despite previous morphological and cytological studies, little is known regarding the overall phylogenetic relationships among the Rubus species in Taiwan, and their relationships to congeneric species in continental China. We characterized eight complete plastomes of Taiwan endemic Rubus species: subg. Idaeobatus (R. glandulosopunctatus, R. incanus, R. parviaraliifolius, R rubroangustifolius, R. taitoensis, and R. taiwanicolus) and subg. Malachobatus (R. kawakamii and R. laciniastostipulatus) to determine their phylogenetic relationships. The plastomes were highly conserved and the size of the complete plastome sequences ranged from 155,566 to 156,236 bp. The overall GC content ranged from 37.0 to 37.3%. The frequency of codon usage showed similar patterns among species, and 29 of the 73 common protein-coding genes were positively selected. The comparative phylogenomic analysis identified four highly variable intergenic regions (rps16/trnQ, petA/psbJ, rpl32/trnL-UAG, and trnT-UGU/trnL-UAA). Phylogenetic analysis of 31 representative complete plastomes within the family Rosaceae revealed three major lineages within Rubus in Taiwan. However, overall phylogenetic relationships among endemic species require broader taxon sampling to gain new insights into infrageneric relationships and their plastome evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.