ArticleScientific reports2021
Preceding endoscopic submucosal dissection in submucosal invasive gastric cancer patients does not impact clinical outcomes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence in endoscopic prediction of submucosal invasion in gastric neoplasms: systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2026Review
- A nomogram to predict submucosal fibrosis in early gastric cancer undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Weakly Supervised Learning for Poorly Differentiated Adenocarcinoma Classification in GastricEndoscopic Submucosal Dissection Whole Slide Images.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Submucosal deep invasion of gastric cancer (T1b2; depth of submucosal invasion ≥ 500 μm) is a risk factor for lymph node metastasis and, thus, is one of the criteria for curative treatment. Our aim was to evaluate the specific influence of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) on the prognosis of patients with T1b2 gastric cancer. This was a retrospective analysis of 248 consecutive patients, with 252 pT1b2 gastric cancer lesions, who underwent ESD prior to additional surgery (Group A, n = 101) or surgery only (Group B, n = 147). After propensity score-matching (for sex, age, tumor diameter and gross type), we compared pathological characteristics between the 2 groups and the prognosis over a follow-up period ≥ 60 months. Compared to Group B, patients in Group A were older, with a higher proportion of men. The proportion of depressed and undifferentiated type tumors was greater in Group B than A, with larger tumor size and depth of submucosal invasion as well. There was no incidence of local recurrence, but distant metastasis was identified in 5% of cases in Group A and 3% in Group B. After propensity score-matching, there were no difference in the 5-year overall survival rate between Group A and B (87.5% vs. 91.2%, respectively), nor in the 5-year disease-specific survival rate (96.3% vs. 96.4%, respectively). ESD prior to surgery for T1b2 gastric cancer did not adversely affect clinical outcomes after additional surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.