Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33441631›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Run-off election-based decision method for the training and inference process in an artificial neural network.

Jingon Jang, Seonghoon Jang, Sanghyeon Choi, Gunuk Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jingon JangKU-KIST Graduate School of Converging Science and Technology, Korea University, 145, Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea. jangjg@korea.ac.kr.
Seonghoon JangKU-KIST Graduate School of Converging Science and Technology, Korea University, 145, Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea.
Sanghyeon ChoiKU-KIST Graduate School of Converging Science and Technology, Korea University, 145, Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea.
Gunuk WangKU-KIST Graduate School of Converging Science and Technology, Korea University, 145, Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea. gunukwang@korea.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Generally, the decision rule for classifying unstructured data in an artificial neural network system depends on the sequence results of an activation function determined by vector-matrix multiplication between the input bias signal and the analog synaptic weight quantity of each node in a matrix array. Although a sequence-based decision rule can efficiently extract a common feature in a large data set in a short time, it can occasionally fail to classify similar species because it does not intrinsically consider other quantitative configurations of the activation function that affect the synaptic weight update. In this work, we implemented a simple run-off election-based decision rule via an additional filter evaluation to mitigate the confusion from proximity of output activation functions, enabling the improved training and inference performance of artificial neural network system. Using the filter evaluation selected via the difference among common features of classified images, the recognition accuracy achieved for three types of shoe image data sets reached ~ 82.03%, outperforming the maximum accuracy of ~ 79.23% obtained via the sequence-based decision rule in a fully connected single layer network. This training algorithm with an independent filter can precisely supply the output class in the decision step of the fully connected network.

Identifiers

PMID33441631
PMCPMC7806707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.