Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33441560›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Genome-wide macroevolutionary signatures of key innovations in butterflies colonizing new host plants.

Rémi Allio, Benoit Nabholz, Stefan Wanke, Guillaume Chomicki, Oscar A Pérez-Escobar, Adam M Cotton, Anne-Laure Clamens, Gaël J Kergoat, Felix A H Sperling, Fabien L Condamine

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
21.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Whole genome analysis of toxic Papilionidae butterflies utilizing aristolochic acid, Pachliopta aristolochiae, and Byasa alcinous.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Evolutionary Changes ofEcology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Insects · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Rémi AllioCNRS, IRD, EPHE, Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, Place Eugène Bataillon, 34095, Montpellier, France. rem.allio@yahoo.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3885-5410
Benoit NabholzCNRS, IRD, EPHE, Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, Place Eugène Bataillon, 34095, Montpellier, France.
Stefan WankeInstitut für Botanik, Technische Universität Dresden, Zellescher Weg 20b, 01062, Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5405-5216
Guillaume ChomickiDepartment of Bioscience, Durham University, Stockton Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK.
Oscar A Pérez-EscobarRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, TW9 3AB, UK.
Adam M Cotton86/2 Moo 5, Tambon Nong Kwai, Hang Dong, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4852-903X
Anne-Laure ClamensCBGP, INRAE, CIRAD, IRD, Montpellier SupAgro, Univ. Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Gaël J KergoatCBGP, INRAE, CIRAD, IRD, Montpellier SupAgro, Univ. Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8284-6215
Felix A H SperlingDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, T6G 2E9, AB, Canada.
Fabien L CondamineCNRS, IRD, EPHE, Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, Place Eugène Bataillon, 34095, Montpellier, France. fabien.condamine@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1673-9910
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRCentre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement · FRDurham University · GBMaharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital · THRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew · GBTechnische Universität Dresden · DEUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mega-diversity of herbivorous insects is attributed to their co-evolutionary associations with plants. Despite abundant studies on insect-plant interactions, we do not know whether host-plant shifts have impacted both genomic adaptation and species diversification over geological times. We show that the antagonistic insect-plant interaction between swallowtail butterflies and the highly toxic birthworts began 55 million years ago in Beringia, followed by several major ancient host-plant shifts. This evolutionary framework provides a valuable opportunity for repeated tests of genomic signatures of macroevolutionary changes and estimation of diversification rates across their phylogeny. We find that host-plant shifts in butterflies are associated with both genome-wide adaptive molecular evolution (more genes under positive selection) and repeated bursts of speciation rates, contributing to an increase in global diversification through time. Our study links ecological changes, genome-wide adaptations and macroevolutionary consequences, lending support to the importance of ecological interactions as evolutionary drivers over long time periods.

Indexed as

EcosystemEvolution, MolecularAnimalsButterfliesGenome, InsectGenome-Wide Association StudyGeographyHost-Parasite InteractionsPhylogenyPlantsSpecies SpecificityTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID33441560
PMCPMC7806994
OpenAlexW3118694029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.