Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33441373›Full record

ReviewBMJ open respiratory research2021

Rationale for azithromycin in COVID-19: an overview of existing evidence.

Iwein Gyselinck, Wim Janssens, Peter Verhamme, Robin Vos

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ open respiratory research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Use of antibiotics in Paediatric Primary Health Care before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica (English ed.) · 2023
    Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A Review of Antibiotic Efficacy in COVID-19 Control.Journal of immunology research · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Azithromycin through the Lens of the COVID-19 Treatment.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Iwein GyselinckRespiratory Diseases, KU Leuven University Hospitals, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium iwein.gyselinck@kuleuven.be.ORCID 0000-0002-4068-7228
Wim JanssensRespiratory Diseases, KU Leuven University Hospitals, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium.
Peter VerhammeCardiovascular Diseases, KU Leuven University Hospitals, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium.
Robin VosRespiratory Diseases, KU Leuven University Hospitals, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium.
KU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Azithromycin has rapidly been adopted as a repurposed drug for the treatment of COVID-19, despite the lack of high-quality evidence. In this review, we critically appraise the current pharmacological, preclinical and clinical data of azithromycin for treating COVID-19. Interest in azithromycin has been fuelled by favourable treatment outcomes in other viral pneumonias, a documented antiviral effect on SARS-CoV-2 in vitro and uncontrolled case series early in the pandemic. Its antiviral effects presumably result from interfering with receptor mediated binding, viral lysosomal escape, intracellular cell-signalling pathways and enhancing type I and III interferon expression. Its immunomodulatory effects may mitigate excessive inflammation and benefit tissue repair. Currently, in vivo reports on azithromycin in COVID-19 are conflicting and do not endorse its widespread use outside of clinical trials. They are, however, mostly retrospective and therefore inherently biased. The effect size of azithromycin may depend on when it is started. Also, extended follow-up is needed to assess benefits in the recovery phase. Safety data warrant monitoring of drug-drug interactions and subsequent cardiac adverse events, especially with hydroxychloroquine. More prospective data of large randomised controlled studies are expected and much-needed. Uniform reporting of results should be strongly encouraged to facilitate data pooling with the many ongoing initiatives.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycinHumansSARS-CoV-2Treatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycinCOVID-19respiratory infectionviral infection

Identifiers

PMID33441373
PMCPMC7811960
OpenAlexW3119571885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.