ArticleBMJ open2021
Impact of electronic health records on predefined safety outcomes in patients admitted to hospital: a scoping review.
Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Digital solutions in acute medicine: Will electronic health records join up the patient journey (soon?).Future healthcare journal · 2026Article
- How to Improve Safety in Acupuncture Clinical Practice?Medical acupuncture · 2025Article
- Usability of an electronic health record 6 months post go-live and its association with burnout, insomnia and turnover intention: a cross-sectional study in a hospital setting.BMJ health & care informatics · 2025Article
- Impact of Implementing Electronic Nursing Records on Quality and Safety Indicators in Care.The Libyan journal of medicine · 2024Article
- Successes and challenges towards improving quality of primary health care services: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Evaluating the costs and consequences of computerized clinical decision support systems in hospitals: a scoping review and recommendations for future practice.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023Article
- Review
- Validating ICD-10 codes for adverse drug events in hospitalised older adults: protocol for a cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Prospects of Hospital Information Systems and Patient Safety in Japan.Healthcare informatics research · 2022Article
- Flexibility during the COVID-19 Pandemic Response: Healthcare Facility Assessment Tools for Resilient Evaluation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Review
- Participatory Design of an Electronic Medical Record for Paediatric Palliative Care: A Think-Aloud Study with Nurses and Physicians.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Hospital work environments affect the patient safety climate: A longitudinal follow-up using a logistic regression analysis model.PloS one · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesReview available evidence for impact of electronic health records (EHRs) on predefined patient safety outcomes in interventional studies to identify gaps in current knowledge and design interventions for future research.
designScoping review to map existing evidence and identify gaps for future research. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Trial registers. STUDY SELECTION: Eligibility criteria: We conducted a scoping review of bibliographic databases and the grey literature of randomised and non-randomised trials describing interventions targeting a list of fourteen predefined areas of safety. The search was limited to manuscripts published between January 2008 and December 2018 of studies in adult inpatient settings and complemented by a targeted search for studies using a sample of EHR vendors. Studies were categorised according to methodology, intervention characteristics and safety outcome.Results from identified studies were grouped around common themes of safety measures.
resultsThe search yielded 583 articles of which 24 articles were included. The identified studies were largely from US academic medical centres, heterogeneous in study conduct, definitions, treatment protocols and study outcome reporting. Of the 24 included studies effective safety themes included medication reconciliation, decision support for prescribing medications, communication between teams, infection prevention and measures of EHR-specific harm. Heterogeneity of the interventions and study characteristics precluded a systematic meta-analysis. Most studies reported process measures and not patient-level safety outcomes: We found no or limited evidence in 13 of 14 predefined safety areas, with good evidence limited to medication safety.
conclusionsPublished evidence for EHR impact on safety outcomes from interventional studies is limited and does not permit firm conclusions regarding the full safety impact of EHRs or support recommendations about ideal design features. The review highlights the need for greater transparency in quality assurance of existing EHRs and further research into suitable metrics and study designs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.