Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33441355›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2021

Singing for people with aphasia (SPA): results of a pilot feasibility randomised controlled trial of a group singing intervention investigating acceptability and feasibility.

Mark Tarrant, Mary Carter, Sarah Gerard Dean, Rod Taylor, Fiona C Warren, Anne Spencer, Jane Adamson, Paolo Landa, Chris Code, Amy Backhouse and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03076736 (Singing for People With Aphasia), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03076736 nacompletednot on this map

Singing for People With Aphasia (SPA): A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial of a Group Singing Intervention to Improve Wellbeing

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ExeterRan2017 to 2018Enrolled41ConditionsAphasiaArmsSinging group + resource pack, Resource pack
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The effect of music therapy on language recovery in patients with aphasia after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Reversing the Ruin: Rehabilitation, Recovery, and Restoration After Stroke.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mark TarrantInstitute of Health Research, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK m.tarrant@exeter.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-7194-1428
Mary CarterInstitute of Health Research, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1063-5814
Sarah Gerard DeanInstitute of Health Research, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3682-5149
Rod TaylorInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3043-6011
Fiona C WarrenInstitute of Health Research, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3833-0182
Anne SpencerInstitute of Health Research, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8163-3103
Jane AdamsonInstitute of Health Research, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Paolo LandaDépartement d'opérations et systèmes de décision, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6532-6747
Chris CodeDepartment of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Amy BackhouseInstitute of Health Research, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7356-0525
Ruth A LamontInstitute of Health Research, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3158-5836
Raff CalitriInstitute of Health Research, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0889-4670
University of Exeter · GBUniversité Laval · CAUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPilot feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT) for the singing groups for people with aphasia (SPA) intervention to assess: (1) the acceptability and feasibility of participant recruitment, randomisation and allocation concealment; (2) retention rates; (3) variance of continuous outcome measures; (4) outcome measure completion and participant burden; (5) fidelity of intervention delivery; (6) SPA intervention costs; (7) acceptability and feasibility of trial and intervention to participants and others involved.

designA two-group, assessor-blinded, randomised controlled external pilot trial with parallel mixed methods process evaluation and economic evaluation.

settingThree community-based cohorts in the South-West of England.

participantsEligible participants with post-stroke aphasia were randomised 1:1 to SPA or control.

interventionThe manualised SPA intervention was delivered over 10 weekly singing group sessions, led by a music facilitator and assisted by an individual with post-stroke aphasia. The intervention was developed using the Information-Motivation-Behavioural skills model of behaviour change and targeted psychosocial outcomes. Control and intervention participants all received an aphasia information resource pack. OUTCOME MEASURES: Collected at baseline, 3 and 6 months post-randomisation, candidate primary outcomes were measured (well-being, quality of life and social participation) as well as additional clinical outcomes. Feasibility, acceptability and process outcomes included recruitment and retention rates, and measurement burden; and trial experiences were explored in qualitative interviews.

resultsOf 87 individuals screened, 42 participants were recruited and 41 randomised (SPA=20, control=21); 36 participants (SPA=17, control=19) completed 3-month follow-up, 34 (SPA=18, control=16) completed 6-month follow-up. Recruitment and retention (83%) were acceptable for a definitive RCT, and participants did not find the study requirements burdensome. High fidelity of the intervention delivery was shown by high attendance rates and facilitator adherence to the manual, and participants found SPA acceptable. Sample size estimates for a definitive RCT and primary/secondary outcomes were identified.

conclusionsThe SPA pilot RCT fulfilled its objectives, and demonstrated that a definitive RCT of the intervention would be both feasible and acceptable. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03076736.

Indexed as

AphasiaSingingEnglandFeasibility StudiesHumansMotivationsocial medicinestrokestroke medicine

Identifiers

PMID33441355
PMCPMC7812101
OpenAlexW3118559889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.