ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2021
Targetable alterations in invasive pleomorphic lobular carcinoma of the breast.
Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endoscopic detection of signet ring cell carcinoma in CDH1 carriers: a 15-year single-centre experience.Familial cancer · 2026Article
- Clinicopathological Features of HER2 Expressing Lobular Carcinoma of Breast.World journal of oncology · 2025Article
- Diagnosis and Management of Invasive Pleomorphic Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast: A Case Report and Comprehensive Review of Current Literature.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Review
- Invasive lobular breast carcinoma variants; clinicopathological features and patient outcomes.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Article
- Hereditary diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer syndrome associated with germline CDH1 variants: focus on lobular breast cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Nuclear morphological characterisation of lobular carcinoma variants: a morphometric study.Histopathology · 2025Article
- Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: metastatic patterns and treatment modalities-a review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Classification of Breast Cancer Through the Perspective of Cell Identity Models.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025Review
- Review
- Review
- Biomarker profile of invasive lobular carcinoma: pleomorphic versus classic subtypes, clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis analyses.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2022Article
- Clinical Characteristics and Survival Outcomes of Infiltrating Lobular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study of 365 Cases in China.Cancer management and research · 2022Article
- Review
- Lobular Breast Cancer: Histomorphology and Different Concepts of a Special Spectrum of Tumors.Cancers · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInvasive pleomorphic lobular carcinoma (PLC) of the breast is a subtype of invasive lobular cancer which compromises approximately 1% of all epithelial breast malignancies and is characterized by higher nuclear pleomorphism and poorer prognosis than classic invasive lobular cancer (ILC). Since PLC is more aggressive than classical ILC, we examined the underlying molecular alterations in this subtype of breast cancer to understand the possible benefit from targeted therapies.
methodsIn this study, we investigate the clinical characteristics and molecular alterations in 16 PLC from our institution. Additionally, we examined the clinical and genomic features in 31 PLC from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA).
resultsOverall, our analysis of PLC found that 28% had activating ERBB2 mutations, 21% had ERBB2 amplification, and 49% activating PIK3CA mutations. Among cases from our institution, we found 19% with activating ERBB2 mutations, 25% had ERBB2 amplification, and 38% with activating PIK3CA mutations. In data from TCGA, 32% had activating ERBB2 mutations, 19% had ERBB2 amplification, and 55% had activating PIK3CA mutations. While classic ILC in TCGA had similar percentages of PIK3CA alterations compared to PLC, activating ERBB2 alterations were exceedingly rare, with no activating ERBB2 mutations and only one case with ERBB2 amplification. Interestingly, in further examining TCGA data which included FGFR1 and PTEN, 94% of PLC had alterations in ERBB2, FGFR1, or the PI3K pathway.
conclusionsOur results show a high frequency of ERBB2 and PIK3CA alterations in PLC and suggest all PLC should be tested for potential therapeutic targeting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.