Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33441068›Full record

ReviewCurrent neuropharmacology2021

Grazia D'Onofrio, Seyed Mohammad Nabavi, Daniele Sancarlo, Antonio Greco, Stefano Pieretti

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current neuropharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. The Therapeutic Effects ofHealth science reports · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The Functional Characteristics and Soluble Expression of SaffronInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Grazia D'OnofrioClinical Psychology Service, Health Department, Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, Italy.
Seyed Mohammad NabaviApplied Biotechnology Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Daniele SancarloComplex Structure of Geriatrics, Department of Medical Sciences, Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, Iran.
Antonio GrecoComplex Structure of Geriatrics, Department of Medical Sciences, Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, Iran.
Stefano PierettiIstituto Superiore di Sanità, National Center for Drug Research and Evaluation, Rome, Italy.
Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza · ITBaqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences · IRIstituto Superiore di Sanità · IT

Funding

“Ministero della Salute”, I.R.C.C.S. Research Program, Ricerca Corrente 2018-2020 “5 X 1000” VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTION
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crocus sativus L. (saffron) appears to own neuroprotective effects on cognitive impairment in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). The purpose of this work is to review evidence and mechanisms of saffron-induced therapeutic outcomes and measureable cognitive benefits in AD. The literature was reviewed, and preclinical and clinical studies were identified. In vitro and in vivo preclinical studies were selected according to these criteria: 1) development of saffron pharmacological profile on biological or biophysical endpoints; 2) evaluation of saffron efficacy using animal screens as an AD model, and 3) duration of the studies of at least 3 months. As for the clinical studies, the selection criteria included: 1) patients aged ≥ 60, 2) AD diagnosis according to National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association (NIAAA) criteria, and 3) appropriate procedures to assess cognitive, functional, and clinical status. A total of 1477 studies published until November 2020 were identified during an initial phase, of which 24 met the inclusion criteria and were selected for this review. Seventeen in vitro and in vivo preclinical studies have described the efficacy of saffron on cognitive impairment in animal models of AD, highlighting that crocin appears to be able to regulate glutamate levels, reduce oxidative stress, and modulate Aβ and tau protein aggregation. Only four clinical studies have indicated that the effects of saffron on cognitive impairment were not different from those produced by donepezil and memantine and that it had a better safety profile. Saffron and its compounds should be further investigated in order to consider them a safer alternative in AD treatment.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionCrocusAnimalsDonepezilHumansMemantineDonepezilMemantineAChE inhibitorAlzheimer's diseaseanti-Aβantioxidantneuroprotective effectSaffrontau protein inhibitor.treatment

Identifiers

PMID33441068
PMCPMC8762181
OpenAlexW3119971346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.