Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33440794›Full record

ArticleVaccines2021

Who Is Really at Risk for Anaphylaxis Due to COVID-19 Vaccine?

Marco Caminati, Gabriella Guarnieri, Gianenrico Senna

Open access · goldAbstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Allergic Reactions to COVID-19 Vaccines: Risk Factors, Frequency, Mechanisms and Management.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2022
    Review
  7. A Case Report of Prolonged Anaphylaxis after COVID-19 Vaccine.Clinical practice and cases in emergency medicine · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Safety & effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines: A narrative review.The Indian journal of medical research · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Adverse reactions to COVID-19 vaccines: A practical approach.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marco CaminatiDepartment of Medicine, University of Verona and Verona University Hospital, Piazzale L.A. Scuro, 10, 37134 Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7383-1487
Gabriella GuarnieriRespiratory Pathophysiology Unit, Department of Cardiac-Thoracic-Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35121 Padova, Italy.
Gianenrico SennaDepartment of Medicine, University of Verona and Verona University Hospital, Piazzale L.A. Scuro, 10, 37134 Verona, Italy.
University of Verona · ITUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The vaccination campaign against the Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (Sars-Cov-2) started on 8 December 2020 in UK, after the approval of BNT162b2 by the Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) [...].

Identifiers

PMID33440794
PMCPMC7827676
OpenAlexW3120927170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.