Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33440609›Full record

ReviewAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Are We Making the Most of Community Pharmacies? Implementation of Antimicrobial Stewardship Measures in Community Pharmacies: A Narrative Review.

Doris Rusic, Josipa Bukić, Ana Seselja Perisin, Dario Leskur, Darko Modun, Ana Petric, Marino Vilovic, Josko Bozic

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Pharmacists knowledge, perception and practice regarding medication disposal.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Doris RusicDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Split School of Medicine, Soltanska 2, 21 000 Split, Croatia.
Josipa BukićDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Split School of Medicine, Soltanska 2, 21 000 Split, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-9316-5538
Ana Seselja PerisinDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Split School of Medicine, Soltanska 2, 21 000 Split, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0001-7927-5311
Dario LeskurDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Split School of Medicine, Soltanska 2, 21 000 Split, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-5126-3869
Darko ModunDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Split School of Medicine, Soltanska 2, 21 000 Split, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0001-9508-9383
Ana PetricDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Split School of Medicine, Soltanska 2, 21 000 Split, Croatia.
Marino VilovicDepartment of Pathophysiology, University of Split School of Medicine, Soltanska 2, 21 000 Split, Croatia.
Josko BozicDepartment of Pathophysiology, University of Split School of Medicine, Soltanska 2, 21 000 Split, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0003-1634-0635
University of Split · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community pharmacists recognize the need to implement antimicrobial stewardship activities in community pharmacies. They are in a unique position to provide triage for common primary care indications and to lower the burden of patients at general practitioners' offices. However, research shows that, in some areas, dispensing of antimicrobials without valid prescription is still highly prevalent. Regardless of training, every community pharmacist can give his contribution to antimicrobial stewardship. One of the basic elements should be antimicrobial dispensing according to regulations, either prescription only, or according to guidelines where pharmacists have prescribing authority. Patient consultation supported with educational materials, such as leaflets, may reduce patients' expectations to receive antibiotics for self-limiting infections and reduce pressure on general practitioners to prescribe antibiotics on patients' demand. Treatment optimization may be achieved in collaboration with the prescribing general practitioners or by providing feedback. At last, pharmacists provided with additional training may be encouraged to provide consultation services to long-term care facilities, to introduce point-of-care testing for infectious diseases in their pharmacies or prescribe antimicrobials for uncomplicated infections. These services are welcomed by patients and communities. Expanding pharmacy services and pharmacists' prescribing autonomy have shown a positive impact by reducing antibiotics consumption, thus ensuring better compliance with treatment guidelines.

Indexed as

antimicrobial resistanceantimicrobial stewardshipcommunity pharmacyprimary carerespiratory tract infectionsurinary tract infections

Identifiers

PMID33440609
PMCPMC7827930
OpenAlexW3118797489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.