Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33440590›Full record

ArticleACS biomaterials science & engineering2016

Electrospun Polyurethane and Hydrogel Composite Scaffolds as Biomechanical Mimics for Aortic Valve Tissue Engineering.

Daniel S Puperi, Alysha Kishan, Zoe E Punske, Yan Wu, Elizabeth Cosgriff-Hernandez, Jennifer L West, K Jane Grande-Allen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS biomaterials science & engineering, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Feasibility of a Dielectric Elastomer Augmented Aorta.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel S PuperiDepartment of Bioengineering, Rice University, 6500 Main Street, Houston, Texas 77030, United States.
Alysha KishanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University, 2121 W Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, Texas 77030, United States.
Zoe E PunskeDepartment of Bioengineering, Rice University, 6500 Main Street, Houston, Texas 77030, United States.
Yan WuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, 121 Science Drive, Durham, North Carolina 27708, United States.
Elizabeth Cosgriff-HernandezDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University, 2121 W Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, Texas 77030, United States.
Jennifer L WestDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, 121 Science Drive, Durham, North Carolina 27708, United States.
K Jane Grande-AllenDepartment of Bioengineering, Rice University, 6500 Main Street, Houston, Texas 77030, United States.
Rice University · USDuke University · USTexas A&M University · US

Funding

Biomimetic micro-structured hydrogel scaffolds for tissue engineered heart valvesR01HL107765 · NHLBI · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI GRANDE-ALLEN, KATHRYN JANE, WEST, JENNIFER L · 2011 to 2014
$1.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL107765
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, a composite scaffold consisting of an electrospun polyurethane and poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogel was investigated for aortic valve tissue engineering. This multilayered approach permitted the fabrication of a scaffold that met the desired mechanical requirements while enabling the 3D culture of cells. The scaffold was tuned to mimic the tensile strength, anisotropy, and extensibility of the natural aortic valve through design of the electrospun polyurethane mesh layer. Valve interstitial cells were encapsulated inside the hydrogel portion of the scaffold around the electrospun mesh, creating a composite scaffold approximately 200 μm thick. The stiffness of the electrospun fibers caused the encapsulated cells to exhibit an activated phenotype that resulted in fibrotic remodeling of the scaffold in a heterogeneous manner. Remodeling was further explored by culturing the scaffolds in both a mechanically constrained state and in a bent state. The constrained scaffolds demonstrated strong fibrotic remodeling with cells aligning in the direction of the mechanical constraint. Bent scaffolds demonstrated that applied mechanical forces could influence cell behavior. Cells seeded on the outside curve of the bend exhibited an activated, fibrotic response, while cells seeded on the inside curve of the bend were a quiescent phenotype, demonstrating potential control over the fibrotic behavior of cells. Overall, these results indicate that this polyurethane/hydrogel scaffold mimics the structural and functional heterogeneity of native valves and warrants further investigation to be used as a model for understanding fibrotic valve disease.

Indexed as

electrospinningheart valvepolyurethanetissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID33440590
PMCPMC10615647
OpenAlexW2509378756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.