ArticleApplied clinical informatics2021
Leveraging Real-World Data for the Selection of Relevant Eligibility Criteria for the Implementation of Electronic Recruitment Support in Clinical Trials.
Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reusing data from HL7 CDA-based shared EHR systems for clinical trial conduct: a method for analyzing feasibility.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Clinical decision making in prostate cancer care-evaluation of EAU-guidelines use and novel decision support software.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Enrollment Success, Factors, and Prediction Models in Cancer Trials (2008-2019).JCO oncology practice · 2023Article
- Automatic knowledge extraction from Chinese electronic medical records and rheumatoid arthritis knowledge graph construction.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- A survey of United States adult privacy perspectives and willingness to share real-world data.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- Searching of Clinical Trials Made Easier in cBioPortal Using Patients' Genetic and Clinical Profiles.Applied clinical informatics · 2022Article
- Leveraging electronic health record data for clinical trial planning by assessing eligibility criteria's impact on patient count and safety.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2022Article
- Technology-assisted adaptive recruitment strategy for a large nation-wide COVID-19 vaccine immunogenicity study in Brunei.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- PCaGuard: A Software Platform to Support Optimal Management of Prostate Cancer.Applied clinical informatics · 2022Article
- Initial experience with AI Pathway Companion: Evaluation of dashboard-enhanced clinical decision making in prostate cancer screening.PloS one · 2022Article
- Impacts of Eligibility Criteria on Trial Participants' Age in Alzheimer's Disease Clinical Trials.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2022Article
- The potential role of EHR data in optimizing eligibility criteria definition for cardiovascular outcome trials.International journal of medical informatics · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEven though clinical trials are indispensable for medical research, they are frequently impaired by delayed or incomplete patient recruitment, resulting in cost overruns or aborted studies. Study protocols based on real-world data with precisely expressed eligibility criteria and realistic cohort estimations are crucial for successful study execution. The increasing availability of routine clinical data in electronic health records (EHRs) provides the opportunity to also support patient recruitment during the prescreening phase. While solutions for electronic recruitment support have been published, to our knowledge, no method for the prioritization of eligibility criteria in this context has been explored.
methodsIn the context of the Electronic Health Records for Clinical Research (EHR4CR) project, we examined the eligibility criteria of the KATHERINE trial. Criteria were extracted from the study protocol, deduplicated, and decomposed. A paper chart review and data warehouse query were executed to retrieve clinical data for the resulting set of simplified criteria separately from both sources. Criteria were scored according to disease specificity, data availability, and discriminatory power based on their content and the clinical dataset.
resultsThe study protocol contained 35 eligibility criteria, which after simplification yielded 70 atomic criteria. For a cohort of 106 patients with breast cancer and neoadjuvant treatment, 47.9% of data elements were captured through paper chart review, with the data warehouse query yielding 26.9% of data elements. Score application resulted in a prioritized subset of 17 criteria, which yielded a sensitivity of 1.00 and specificity 0.57 on EHR data (paper charts, 1.00 and 0.80) compared with actual recruitment in the trial.
conclusionIt is possible to prioritize clinical trial eligibility criteria based on real-world data to optimize prescreening of patients on a selected subset of relevant and available criteria and reduce implementation efforts for recruitment support. The performance could be further improved by increasing EHR data coverage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.