ArticleClinical and experimental emergency medicine2020
STOP5: a hot debrief model for resuscitation cases in the emergency department.
Article in Clinical and experimental emergency medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Implementation of a Structured Hot Debrief Tool in a Metropolitan ED: A Quality Improvement Study.Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA · 2026Article
- Implementing a Cold Debrief Program in the Emergency Department: A Framework for Reflection and System Improvement.Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA · 2026Article
- Transfer of clinical debriefing from simulation to practice: exploring the barriers and enablers.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2026Article
- FPHC Wellbeing Charter: The 'Whys' and 'Hows' of the Charter.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025Review
- A systematic scoping review of group reflection in medical education.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Worldwide snapshot of trauma team structure and training: an international survey.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023Article
- Non-technical skills and teamwork in trauma: from the emergency department to the operating room.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Review
- Implementing a Resilience Bundle for Emergency Nurses: An Evidence-Based Practice Project.Journal of emergency nursing · 2023Article
- Measuring non-technical skills during prehospital advanced cardiac life support: A pilot study.Resuscitation plus · 2021Article
- Establishing a Quality Improvement Program for Pediatric In-hospital Cardiac Arrest.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTeam-based resuscitation in emergency departments (EDs) is an excellent opportunity for hot debriefs (HDBs). In creating a bespoke HDB model for emergency medicine resuscitations, we sought to optimize learning from clinical experience, identify team strengths, challenges, encourage honest reflection and focus on ways of improving future performance.
methodsMultidisciplinary ED focus groups reviewed existing models, identified benefits/barriers and created new frame works, testing and adapting further using fottage of a simulated complex resuscitation case. The new HDB tool was coined: "STOP5" (STOP for 5 minutes). Cases targeted were prehospital retrievals, major trauma, cardiac arrests, deaths in resuscitation, and staff-triggered. The framework details included a specifically scripted introduction followed by core elements that were S: summarize the case; T: things that went well; O: opportunities to improve; P: points to action and responsibilities. Staffs were surveyed at 1 month prior then 6 and 18 months post-introduction. Data collection forms were used to identify and track hard outcomes/system improvements resulting directly from HDBs.
resultsPotential benefits identified by respondents included: improved staff morale; team cohesion; improved care for future patients; promoting a culture for learning, patient safety and quality improvement. Ten process and equipment changes resulted directly from STOP5 over 12 months.
conclusionWe anticipate the STOP5 framework to be globally generalizable and effective for many ED teams.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.