Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33440103›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental emergency medicine2020

STOP5: a hot debrief model for resuscitation cases in the emergency department.

Craig Andrew Walker, Laura McGregor, Cameron Taylor, Sara Robinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental emergency medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. FPHC Wellbeing Charter: The 'Whys' and 'Hows' of the Charter.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Worldwide snapshot of trauma team structure and training: an international survey.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Craig Andrew WalkerEmergency Department, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Laura McGregorScottish Centre for Simulation and Clinical Human Factors, Forth Valley Royal Hospital, Forth Valley, United Kingdom.
Cameron TaylorEmergency Department, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Sara RobinsonEmergency Department, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTeam-based resuscitation in emergency departments (EDs) is an excellent opportunity for hot debriefs (HDBs). In creating a bespoke HDB model for emergency medicine resuscitations, we sought to optimize learning from clinical experience, identify team strengths, challenges, encourage honest reflection and focus on ways of improving future performance.

methodsMultidisciplinary ED focus groups reviewed existing models, identified benefits/barriers and created new frame works, testing and adapting further using fottage of a simulated complex resuscitation case. The new HDB tool was coined: "STOP5" (STOP for 5 minutes). Cases targeted were prehospital retrievals, major trauma, cardiac arrests, deaths in resuscitation, and staff-triggered. The framework details included a specifically scripted introduction followed by core elements that were S: summarize the case; T: things that went well; O: opportunities to improve; P: points to action and responsibilities. Staffs were surveyed at 1 month prior then 6 and 18 months post-introduction. Data collection forms were used to identify and track hard outcomes/system improvements resulting directly from HDBs.

resultsPotential benefits identified by respondents included: improved staff morale; team cohesion; improved care for future patients; promoting a culture for learning, patient safety and quality improvement. Ten process and equipment changes resulted directly from STOP5 over 12 months.

conclusionWe anticipate the STOP5 framework to be globally generalizable and effective for many ED teams.

Indexed as

Clinical competenceEducationEmergenciesFeedbackResuscitation

Identifiers

PMID33440103
PMCPMC7808839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.