Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33440035›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology2021

Allergen labelling: Current practice and improvement from a communication perspective.

W Marty Blom, Liselotte M van Dijk, Anouska Michelsen-Huisman, Geert F Houben, André C Knulst, Yvette F M Linders, Kitty C M Verhoeckx, Bregje C Holleman, Leo R Lentz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Recent Advances in Food Allergens and Emerging Biosensing Technologies.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Poor understanding of allergen labelling by allergic and non-allergic consumers.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

W Marty BlomTNO, The Netherlands Organisation of Applied Scientific Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6853-0900
Liselotte M van DijkUtrecht Institute for Linguistics OTS, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5747-7163
Anouska Michelsen-HuismanDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Geert F HoubenTNO, The Netherlands Organisation of Applied Scientific Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
André C KnulstDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Yvette F M LindersUtrecht Institute for Linguistics OTS, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Kitty C M VerhoeckxDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6557-3198
Bregje C HollemanUtrecht Institute for Linguistics OTS, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2208-8018
Leo R LentzUtrecht Institute for Linguistics OTS, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAllergen information on product labels is crucial in food allergy management, though inadequacy in current labelling practices is one of the major causes for accidental reactions upon consuming prepacked food products.

objectiveThis study analyses current status of communicating allergen information on food labels and provides practical recommendations for improving the label format based on communication theory.

methodsProduct labels (N 288) of seven food categories from private label products and brands were obtained at three retailers in the Netherlands. Information regarding the 14 EU-regulated allergens was evaluated by the frequency of emphasizing allergens in the ingredient list, use of precautionary allergen labelling (PAL), icons and an allergen information section. Effectiveness of communication was assessed evaluating readability and findability of information on allergens using principles of Gestalt and Cognitive Load theories.

resultsAs requested by EU regulation 1169/2011, emphasizing allergens in the ingredient list was almost 100%, all other presentations of information on allergens on labels was highly diverse. A separate allergen information section was present on most private label products. This section could, but not necessarily did, repeat allergens from the ingredient list and/or give a PAL. Brands often provided a PAL at the end of the ingredient list. Part of the products displayed an icon at different locations of the label. Label background, a lack of cohesion and variation in location of topics hamper the identification of relevant information on allergens by (allergic) consumers. Recommendations include a standardized order for mandatory and voluntary topics on the label and a separate allergen information section. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Overall, consumers encounter a wide and inconsistent range in ways of presentation of allergen information on labels. Standardization according to basic design principles can improve usability and support safe food purchases for allergic consumers.

Indexed as

AllergensCommunicationFood LabelingFood HypersensitivityNetherlandsAllergensanaphylaxisfood allergypreventionquality-of-liferegulatory aspects

Identifiers

PMID33440035
PMCPMC8048984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.