Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33439946›Full record

ArticleRevista latino-americana de enfermagem2021

Confirmatory factorial analysis of the Maslach Burnout Inventory - Human Services Survey in health professionals in emergency services.

Sandra de Souza Pereira, Joana Fornés-Vives, Sara Guadalupe Unda-Rojas, Gerson Alves Pereira-Junior, Mario Francisco Juruena, Lucilene Cardoso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista latino-americana de enfermagem, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Burnout in emergency department staff: The prevalence and barriers to intervention.The South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sandra de Souza PereiraUniversidade do Estado de Minas Gerais, Unidade Passos, Passos, MG, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1918-7771
Joana Fornés-VivesUniversitat de les lles Balears, Departamento de Enfermería y Fisioterapia, Palma de Mallorca, Illes Balears, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8733-7594
Sara Guadalupe Unda-RojasUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Facultad de Estudios Superiores Zaragoza, Ciudad de México, CDMX, Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6113-055X
Gerson Alves Pereira-JuniorUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3920-3000
Mario Francisco JuruenaKing's College London, Department of Psychological Medicine, London, ENG, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8558-3396
Lucilene CardosoUniversidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, PAHO/WHO Collaborating Centre for Nursing Research Development, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9010-4193

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveto confirm the factorial validity of the Maslach Burnout Inventory - Human Services Survey version in a sample of health professionals from the emergency services.

methoda quantitative, exploratory, descriptive and analytical study. Two hundred and eighty-two health professionals participated in the study. For data collection, a sociodemographic questionnaire and the Maslach Burnout Inventory were used. The psychometric sensitivity for the MBI-HSS items was estimated by measures of central tendency, variability and the distribution shape. Internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach's alpha coefficient and the adequacy of the sample was verified using the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) index. As indexes for assessing the quality of fit of the model, the chi-square ratio by the degrees of freedom (χ2/DoF), the comparative fit index (CFI), the goodness of fit index (GFI), the Tucker Lewis index (TLI) and the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) were considered. To test data fit, the maximum likelihood method was used.

resultsthe three-factor structure of the Maslach Burnout Inventory was confirmed. Items 9, 12, 15 and 16 had a factorial weight below what was considered appropriate and were removed from the model. The second order hierarchical model with the aforementioned modifications presented an adequate adjustment to the data and can be considered the best and most parsimonious model tested according to the information theory indexes. The internal consistency of the instrument's factors was recalculated considering the exclusion of the items and the three factors were considered adequate.

conclusionthe results obtained show that the Maslach Burnout Inventory is a reliable and factorially valid instrument for measuring the burnout syndrome in emergency service professionals in Brazil.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalBurnout, PsychologicalBrazilHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID33439946
PMCPMC7798392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.