ArticlePloS one2021
Rapid detection of ERG11 polymorphism associated azole resistance in Candida tropicalis.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unravelling azole resistance in fungal pathogens: molecular mechanisms, diagnostic challenges, and therapeutic strategies.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025Review
- Azole Resistance andJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Fluconazole resistance amongFrontiers in fungal biology · 2025Article
- Carbon substrates promotes stress resistance and drug tolerance in clinical isolates of Candida tropicalis.Archives of microbiology · 2024Article
- Synthesis of new imidazole-based ionic liquids with antifungal activity againstIranian journal of microbiology · 2023Article
- Development of a high-resolution melt-based assay to rapidly detect the azole-resistantCurrent medical mycology · 2023Article
- Lack of Association between Fluconazole Susceptibility andJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Antifungal Exposure and Resistance Development: Defining Minimal Selective Antifungal Concentrations and Testing Methodologies.Frontiers in fungal biology · 2022Article
- Mechanisms of azole antifungal resistance in clinical isolates of Candida tropicalis.PloS one · 2022Article
- The Mould War: Developing an Armamentarium against Fungal Pathogens Utilising Thymoquinone, Ocimene, and Miramistin within Bacterial Cellulose Matrices.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Molecular Diagnosis of Yeast Infections.Current fungal infection reports · 2021Review
- An update on current and novel molecular diagnostics for the diagnosis of invasive fungal infections.Expert review of molecular diagnosticsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Increasing reports of azole resistance in Candida tropicalis, highlight the development of rapid resistance detection techniques. Nonsynonymous mutations in the lanosterol C14 alpha-demethylase (ERG11) gene is one of the predominant mechanisms of azole resistance in C. tropicalis. We evaluated the tetra primer-amplification refractory mutation system-PCR (T-ARMS-PCR), restriction site mutation (RSM), and high-resolution melt (HRM) analysis methods for rapid resistance detection based on ERG11 polymorphism in C. tropicalis. Twelve azole-resistant and 19 susceptible isolates of C. tropicalis were included. DNA sequencing of the isolates was performed to check the ERG11 polymorphism status among resistant and susceptible isolates. Three approaches T-ARMS-PCR, RSM, and HRM were evaluated and validated for the rapid detection of ERG11 mutation. The fluconazole MICs for the 12 resistant and 19 susceptible isolates were 32-256 mg/L and 0.5-1 mg/L, respectively. The resistant isolates showed A339T and C461T mutations in the ERG11 gene. The T-ARMS-PCR and RSM approaches discriminated all the resistant and susceptible isolates, whereas HRM analysis differentiated all except one susceptible isolate. The sensitivity, specificity, analytical sensitivity, time, and cost of analysis suggests that these three methods can be utilized for the rapid detection of ERG11 mutations in C. tropicalis. Additionally, an excellent concordance with DNA sequencing was noted for all three methods. The rapid, sensitive, and inexpensive T-ARMS-PCR, RSM, and HRM approaches are suitable for the detection of azole resistance based on ERG11 polymorphism in C. tropicalis and can be implemented in clinical setups for batter patient management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.