Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33439909›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Rapid detection of ERG11 polymorphism associated azole resistance in Candida tropicalis.

Saikat Paul, Rajneesh Dadwal, Shreya Singh, Dipika Shaw, Arunaloke Chakrabarti, Shivaprakash M Rudramurthy, Anup K Ghosh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Azole Resistance andJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Fluconazole resistance amongFrontiers in fungal biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Lack of Association between Fluconazole Susceptibility andJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Molecular Diagnosis of Yeast Infections.Current fungal infection reports · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Saikat PaulDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Rajneesh DadwalDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8539-3071
Shreya SinghDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Dipika ShawDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Arunaloke ChakrabartiDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Shivaprakash M RudramurthyDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Anup K GhoshDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0341-6680
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing reports of azole resistance in Candida tropicalis, highlight the development of rapid resistance detection techniques. Nonsynonymous mutations in the lanosterol C14 alpha-demethylase (ERG11) gene is one of the predominant mechanisms of azole resistance in C. tropicalis. We evaluated the tetra primer-amplification refractory mutation system-PCR (T-ARMS-PCR), restriction site mutation (RSM), and high-resolution melt (HRM) analysis methods for rapid resistance detection based on ERG11 polymorphism in C. tropicalis. Twelve azole-resistant and 19 susceptible isolates of C. tropicalis were included. DNA sequencing of the isolates was performed to check the ERG11 polymorphism status among resistant and susceptible isolates. Three approaches T-ARMS-PCR, RSM, and HRM were evaluated and validated for the rapid detection of ERG11 mutation. The fluconazole MICs for the 12 resistant and 19 susceptible isolates were 32-256 mg/L and 0.5-1 mg/L, respectively. The resistant isolates showed A339T and C461T mutations in the ERG11 gene. The T-ARMS-PCR and RSM approaches discriminated all the resistant and susceptible isolates, whereas HRM analysis differentiated all except one susceptible isolate. The sensitivity, specificity, analytical sensitivity, time, and cost of analysis suggests that these three methods can be utilized for the rapid detection of ERG11 mutations in C. tropicalis. Additionally, an excellent concordance with DNA sequencing was noted for all three methods. The rapid, sensitive, and inexpensive T-ARMS-PCR, RSM, and HRM approaches are suitable for the detection of azole resistance based on ERG11 polymorphism in C. tropicalis and can be implemented in clinical setups for batter patient management.

Indexed as

Mutation, MissensePolymorphism, GeneticAzolesCandida tropicalisCytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemDrug Resistance, FungalFungal ProteinsAzolesCytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemFungal Proteins

Identifiers

PMID33439909
PMCPMC7806177
OpenAlexW3118421288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.