Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33439902›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Modified full-face snorkel masks as reusable personal protective equipment for hospital personnel.

Laurel Kroo, Anesta Kothari, Melanie Hannebelle, George Herring, Thibaut Pollina, Ray Chang, Dominic Peralta, Samhita P Banavar, Eliott Flaum, Hazel Soto-Montoya and 32 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The role of 3D printing during COVID-19 pandemic: a review.Progress in additive manufacturing · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. COVID-19 Diagnostics, Tools, and Prevention.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

42 authors at 14 institutions in 4 countries.

Laurel KrooDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7860-2632
Anesta KothariDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Melanie HannebelleSwiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), School of Engineering, Lausanne, Switzerland.
George HerringDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Thibaut PollinaDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Ray ChangDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Dominic PeraltaStellar Design LLC, San Mateo, CA, United States of America.
Samhita P BanavarDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Eliott FlaumStanford University, Biophysics Program, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Hazel Soto-MontoyaDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Hongquan LiDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Kyle CombesOlin College of Engineering, Needham, MA, United States of America.
Emma PanOlin College of Engineering, Needham, MA, United States of America.
Khang VuOlin College of Engineering, Needham, MA, United States of America.
Kelly YenOlin College of Engineering, Needham, MA, United States of America.
James DaleDeakin College, Australia.
Patrick KolbayDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America.
Simon EllgasWaymo, Mountain View, CA, United States of America.
Rebecca KonteDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Rozhin HajianDepartment of Applied Mathematics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.
Grace ZhongDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Noah JacobsMountain View, CA, United States of America.
Amit JainMountain View, CA, United States of America.
Filip KoberIndependent Contributor, Italy.
Gerry AyalaWildhorn Outfitters, Draper, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America.
Quentin AllinneDecathlon (Subea), Product Engineer, Hendaye, France.
Nicholas CucinelliUniversity of Michigan, Entrepreneurial Leadership Faculty, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America.
Dave KasperiSnorkel Inc, Dexter, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America.
Luca BorroniIndependent Contributor, Italy.
Patrick GerberSwiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Safety, Prevention and Health Domain, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Ross VenookDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Peter BaekU.S. Anesthesia Partners Texas, Dallas, TX, United States of America.
Nitin AroraUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America.
Philip WagnerHospital for Special Surgery, New York City, NY, United States of America.
Roberto MikiMiki & Alfonso Hand & Upper Extremity Center, Miami, FL, United States of America.
Jocelyne KohnInstituto de Oftalmologia, Ophthalmologist, Santiago, Chile.
David Kohn BitranInstituto de Oftalmologia, Ophthalmologist, Santiago, Chile.
John PearsonDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America.
Beatriz Arias-ArcoHospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain.
Ricardo Larrainzar-GarijoHospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0501-2006
Cristián Muñiz HerreraAnesthesiologist, Santiago, Chile.ORCID 0000-0003-4426-6794
Manu PrakashDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8046-8388
Stanford University · USFranklin W. Olin College of Engineering · USÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CHHospital Universitario Infanta Leonor · ESMountain View College · USUniversity of Utah · USDeakin University · AUDraper Laboratory · USHarvard University · USHealthPartners · USHospital for Special Surgery · USMiami Hand Center · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here we adapt and evaluate a full-face snorkel mask for use as personal protective equipment (PPE) for health care workers, who lack appropriate alternatives during the COVID-19 crisis in the spring of 2020. The design (referred to as Pneumask) consists of a custom snorkel-specific adapter that couples the snorkel-port of the mask to a rated filter (either a medical-grade ventilator inline filter or an industrial filter). This design has been tested for the sealing capability of the mask, filter performance, CO2 buildup and clinical usability. These tests found the Pneumask capable of forming a seal that exceeds the standards required for half-face respirators or N95 respirators. Filter testing indicates a range of options with varying performance depending on the quality of filter selected, but with typical filter performance exceeding or comparable to the N95 standard. CO2 buildup was found to be roughly equivalent to levels found in half-face elastomeric respirators in literature. Clinical usability tests indicate sufficient visibility and, while speaking is somewhat muffled, this can be addressed via amplification (Bluetooth voice relay to cell phone speakers through an app) in noisy environments. We present guidance on the assembly, usage (donning and doffing) and decontamination protocols. The benefit of the Pneumask as PPE is that it is reusable for longer periods than typical disposable N95 respirators, as the snorkel mask can withstand rigorous decontamination protocols (that are standard to regular elastomeric respirators). With the dire worldwide shortage of PPE for medical personnel, our conclusions on the performance and efficacy of Pneumask as an N95-alternative technology are cautiously optimistic.

Indexed as

MasksPersonal Protective EquipmentPersonnel, HospitalCarbon DioxideCOVID-19Equipment DesignExhalationFiltrationHumansModels, TheoreticalCarbon Dioxide

Identifiers

PMID33439902
PMCPMC7806161
OpenAlexW3118682858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.