ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2021
Lexical and Acoustic Characteristics of Young and Older Healthy Adults.
Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ageing, Cognitive Deterioration, and Verbal Disfluency: A Case Study in Thailand.Journal of psycholinguistic research · 2026Article
- Semantic memory network resilience in aging: The role of abstract and semantically diverse words.Cognition · 2026Article
- A Machine Learning Framework for Cognitive Impairment Screening from Speech with Multimodal Large Models.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- What Silent Pauses Can 'Tell' Us About the Storytelling Skills of Autistic Children: Relations Between Pausing, Language Skills and Executive Functions.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2025Article
- Automatic classification of AD pathology in FTD phenotypes using natural speech.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024Article
- Automated Measures of Syntactic Complexity in Natural Speech Production: Older and Younger Adults as a Case Study.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024Article
- Changes in Digital Speech Measures in Asymptomatic Carriers of Pathogenic Variants Associated With Frontotemporal Degeneration.Neurology · 2024Article
- Age-related changes in connected speech production: evidence from eye-tracking in the culturally adapted picture description task.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Sex differences in the temporal dynamics of autistic children's natural conversations.Molecular autism · 2023Article
- Comparison of category and letter fluency tasks through automated analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Natural speech markers of Alzheimer's disease co-pathology in Lewy body dementias.Parkinsonism & related disorders · 2022Article
- Automated Analysis of Digitized Letter Fluency Data.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Digital Speech Analysis in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy and Corticobasal Syndromes.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose This study examines the effect of age on language use with an automated analysis of digitized speech obtained from semistructured, narrative speech samples. Method We examined the Cookie Theft picture descriptions produced by 37 older and 76 young healthy participants. Using modern natural language processing and automatic speech recognition tools, we automatically annotated part-of-speech categories of all tokens, calculated the number of tense-inflected verbs, mean length of clause, and vocabulary diversity, and we rated nouns and verbs for five lexical features: word frequency, familiarity, concreteness, age of acquisition, and semantic ambiguity. We also segmented the speech signals into speech and silence and calculated acoustic features, such as total speech time, mean speech and pause segment durations, and pitch values. Results Older speakers produced significantly more fillers, pronouns, and verbs and fewer conjunctions, determiners, nouns, and prepositions than young participants. Older speakers' nouns and verbs were more familiar, more frequent (verbs only), and less ambiguous compared to those of young speakers. Older speakers produced shorter clauses with a lower vocabulary diversity than young participants. They also produced shorter speech segments and longer pauses with increased total speech time and total number of words. Lastly, we observed an interaction of age and sex in pitch ranges. Conclusions Our results suggest that older speakers' lexical content is less diverse, and these speakers produce shorter clauses than young participants in monologic, narrative speech. Our findings show that lexical and acoustic characteristics of semistructured speech samples can be examined with automated methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.