Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33439751›Full record

ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2021

Measuring the Subjective Cost of Listening Effort Using a Discounting Task.

Drew J McLaughlin, Todd S Braver, Jonathan E Peelle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Mood shapes the impact of reward on perceived fatigue from listening.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2024
    Article
  4. Generalized Encoding of the Relative Subjective Value of Cognitive Effort in the Dorsal ACC.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Measuring cognitive effort without difficulty.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Domain-general cognitive motivation: evidence from economic decision-making.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Drew J McLaughlinDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, MO.
Todd S BraverDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, MO.
Jonathan E PeelleDepartment of Otolaryngology, Washington University in St. Louis, MO.

Funding

THE NEUROCOGNITIVE BASIS OF EFFORTFUL LISTENING - Administrative supplement for Alzheimer's DiseaseR01DC014281 · NIDCD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI PEELLE, JONATHAN E · 2015 to 2019
$3.1M
Age-Related Changes in Language ProcessingR56AG059265 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI PEELLE, JONATHAN E · 2019 to 2019
$479k
Healthy Aging and the Cost of Cognitive EffortR21AG067295 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BRAVER, TODD S, PEELLE, JONATHAN E · 2020 to 2021
$433k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG067295NIA NIH HHS R56 AG059265NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014281
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose Objective measures of listening effort have been gaining prominence, as they provide metrics to quantify the difficulty of understanding speech under a variety of circumstances. A key challenge has been to develop paradigms that enable the complementary measurement of subjective listening effort in a quantitatively precise manner. In this study, we introduce a novel decision-making paradigm to examine age-related and individual differences in subjective effort during listening. Method Older and younger adults were presented with spoken sentences mixed with speech-shaped noise at multiple signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs). On each trial, subjects were offered the choice between completing an easier listening trial (presented at +20 dB SNR) for a smaller monetary reward and completing a harder listening trial (presented at either +4, 0, -4, -8, or -12 dB SNR) for a greater monetary reward. By varying the amount of the reward offered for the easier option, the subjective value of performing effortful listening trials at each SNR could be assessed. Results Older adults discounted the value of effortful listening to a greater degree than young adults, opting to accept less money in order to avoid more difficult SNRs. Additionally, older adults with poorer hearing and smaller working memory capacities were more likely to choose easier trials; however, in younger adults, no relationship with hearing or working memory was found. Self-reported measures of economic status did not affect these relationships. Conclusions These findings suggest that subjective listening effort depends on factors including, but not necessarily limited to, hearing and working memory. Additionally, this study demonstrates that economic decision-making paradigms can be a useful approach for assessing subjective listening effort and may prove beneficial in future research.

Indexed as

Speech PerceptionAgedAuditory PerceptionHearingHumansMemory, Short-TermNoiseYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33439751
PMCPMC8632478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.