Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33439686›Full record

ArticleJCO oncology practice2021

Implementing Systematic Genetic Counseling and Multigene Germline Testing for Individuals With Pancreatic Cancer.

Anu Chittenden, Sigurdis Haraldsdottir, Chinedu Ukaegbu, Meghan Underhill-Blazey, Shraddha Gaonkar, Hajime Uno, Lauren K Brais, Kimberly Perez, Brian M Wolpin, Sapna Syngal and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO oncology practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Enhancing management of pancreatic cancer: impact of a same day multidisciplinary clinic on access to guideline-directed care.HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Hereditary Cancer Clinics Improve Adherence to NCCN Germline Testing Guidelines for Pancreatic Cancer.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Anu ChittendenDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Sigurdis HaraldsdottirDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Chinedu UkaegbuDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Meghan Underhill-BlazeyDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Shraddha GaonkarDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Hajime UnoDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Lauren K BraisDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Kimberly PerezDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Brian M WolpinDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Sapna SyngalDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Matthew B YurgelunDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · USDana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center · USHarvard University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

Tissue and Pathology ResourcesP50CA127003 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI BASS, ADAM JOEL · 2007 to 2023
$33.2M
Circulating Biomarker Consortium for Pancreatic Cancer Early DetectionU01CA210171 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI Michael H. Rosenthal, Brian Matthew Wolpin · 2016 to 2026
$8.7M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA127003NCI NIH HHS U01 CA210171
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNational guidelines recommend genetic counseling and multigene germline testing (GC/MGT) for all patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This study's aim was to assess real-world effectiveness of implementing systematic GC/MGT for all patients with PDAC at a high-volume academic institution.

methodsAn iterative process for systematizing GC/MGT was developed in which gastrointestinal oncology providers at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute were recommended to refer all patients with PDAC for GC/MGT (clinician-directed referral). Workflows were subsequently changed such that patients with PDAC were automatically offered GC/MGT when scheduling their initial oncology consultation (automated referral). Clinical and germline data were collected on a consecutive cohort of patients with PDAC undergoing GC/MGT during a 25-month enrollment period (19-month clinician-directed referrals; 6-month automated referrals).

resultsOne thousand two hundred fourteen patients with PDAC were seen for initial oncologic evaluation, 266 (21.9%) of whom underwent GC/MGT. Compared with baseline clinician-directed referrals, implementation of automated referrals led to a significant increase in patients with PDAC undergoing GC/MGT (16.5%

conclusionImplementation of systematic GC/MGT in patients with PDAC is feasible and leads to management changes for patients with PDAC and their families. GC/MGT workflows that bypass the need for clinician referral result in superior uptake and time to testing. Further investigation is needed to identify other barriers and facilitators of universal GC/MGT.

Indexed as

Genetic CounselingPancreatic NeoplasmsGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingGerm CellsHumans

Identifiers

PMID33439686
PMCPMC8257923
OpenAlexW3119723210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.