Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33439554›Full record

ArticleACR open rheumatology2020

The Utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients With Clinical Suspicion of Polymyalgia Rheumatica and Giant Cell Arteritis: A Prospective, Observational, and Cross-sectional Study.

Amir Emamifar, Torkell Ellingsen, Søren Hess, Oke Gerke, Rasmus Hviid Larsen, Ziba Ahangarani Farahani, Per Syrak Hansen, Inger Marie Jensen Hansen, Henrik Petersen, Niels Marcussen and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACR open rheumatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. The Diagnostic Yield of [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  5. Role and potential ofFrontiers in medicine · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Diagnostic accuracy and validation ofFrontiers in medicine · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Amir EmamifarUniversity of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5329-1364
Torkell EllingsenUniversity of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0426-4962
Søren HessUniversity of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1249-133X
Oke GerkeUniversity of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6335-3303
Rasmus Hviid LarsenSvendborg Hospital, OUH, Svendborg, Denmark.
Ziba Ahangarani FarahaniOdense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Per Syrak HansenSvendborg Hospital, OUH, Svendborg, Denmark.
Inger Marie Jensen HansenSvendborg Hospital, OUH, Svendborg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7283-9786
Henrik PetersenUniversity of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1118-1500
Niels MarcussenUniversity of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0516-9361
Michael DahlstrømSvendborg Hospital, OUH, Svendborg, Denmark.
Pia ToftegaardSvendborg Hospital, OUH, Svendborg, Denmark.
Peter Thye-RønnUniversity of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7486-8086

Funding

A.P Møller FondenGigtforeningenOdense UniversitetshospitalSvendborg HospitalSyddansk Universitetthe Region of Southern Denmark
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo define the proportions of agreement between fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), clinical diagnosis, and temporal artery biopsy (TAB) in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) and giant cell arteritis (GCA). Furthermore, the association of 18F-FDG PET/CT uptake patterns and clinical presentation of newly diagnosed PMR and GCA was investigated.

methodsEighty patients newly suspected of having PMR, GCA, or concomitant PMR and GCA were included and followed for 40 weeks. Every patient underwent an 18F-FDG PET/CT scan before or within 3 days of initiation of steroids in case of GCA. FDG uptakes in 8 paired articular/periarticular sites and 14 arterial segments were evaluated based on a 4-point visual grading scale.

resultsOf the 80 patients (female: 50 [62.5%]; mean age ± SD: 72.0 ± 7.9), 64 (80.0%) patients were diagnosed with pure PMR, 3 (3.7%) with pure GCA, and 10 (12.5%) with concomitant PMR and GCA. Additionally, three (3.7%) patients were diagnosed with seronegative rheumatoid arthritis during the follow-up period. For the diagnosis of PMR, 18F-FDG PET/CT had a proportion of agreement of 75.3 (64.2-84.4), compared with clinical diagnosis. When comparing findings of 18F-FDG PET/CT with TAB, 18F-FDG PET/CT had a proportion of agreement of 93.0 (84.3-97.7) in all included patients and 69.2 (38.6-90.9) in the subgroup of patients with vasculitis. C-reactive protein was significantly higher in patients with PMR activity on 18F-FDG PET/CT compared with those without 18F-FDG PET/CT activity (P value = 0.006).

conclusions18F-FDG PET/CT is a powerful imaging technique in PMR and GCA that was in good agreement with clinical diagnosis and TAB.

Identifiers

PMID33439554
PMCPMC7437127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.