Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33439468›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2021

Application of ERAS protocol in esophagectomy: a national survey among Italian centers performing esophageal surgery.

Paolo Parise, Stefano Turi, Eider Talavera-Urquijo, Agnese Carresi, Lavinia Barbieri, Andrea Cossu, Ugo Elmore, Francesco Puccetti, Riccardo Rosati, Italian Society for Study of Diseases of the Esophagus

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Comparison of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Pathway Versus Standard Care in Patients Undergoing Elective Stoma Reversal Surgery- A Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023
    Trial
  3. Sarcopenia and Patient's Body Composition: New Morphometric Tools to Predict Clinical Outcome After Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy: a Multicenter Study.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Paolo PariseGastrointestinal Surgery Unit, San Raffaele Hospital, 60 Via Olgettina, 20132, Milan, Italy. parise.paolo@hsr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0404-4118
Stefano TuriNeurosurgery Intensive Care Unit, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Eider Talavera-UrquijoGastrointestinal Surgery Unit, San Raffaele Hospital, 60 Via Olgettina, 20132, Milan, Italy.
Agnese CarresiGastrointestinal Surgery Unit, San Raffaele Hospital, 60 Via Olgettina, 20132, Milan, Italy.
Lavinia BarbieriGastrointestinal Surgery Unit, San Raffaele Hospital, 60 Via Olgettina, 20132, Milan, Italy.
Andrea CossuGastrointestinal Surgery Unit, San Raffaele Hospital, 60 Via Olgettina, 20132, Milan, Italy.
Ugo ElmoreGastrointestinal Surgery Unit, San Raffaele Hospital, 60 Via Olgettina, 20132, Milan, Italy.
Francesco PuccettiGastrointestinal Surgery Unit, San Raffaele Hospital, 60 Via Olgettina, 20132, Milan, Italy.
Riccardo RosatiGastrointestinal Surgery Unit, San Raffaele Hospital, 60 Via Olgettina, 20132, Milan, Italy.
Italian Society for Study of Diseases of the Esophagus

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of enhanced recovery after surgery guidelines for esophageal surgery in different units remains unclear. This survey intended to investigate how such protocol is applied among Italian esophageal surgery units. A survey with 40 questions was mailed to Italian centers that performed at least 10 esophagectomies per year. It included questions about the type of hospital and unit and pre-, intra- and post-operative items. Difficulties encountered were investigated. Thirteen (65%) centers answered the survey, and all met the minimal safety requirements, e.g., the presence of intensive care units and 24-h on-call operative endoscopy and radiology facilities. Fifty percent of esophagectomies with a minimally invasive approach were performed in 84.6% of the centers. Regarding pre-operative items, the highest scores were for the application of nutritional support, dysphagia palliation and presence of a multidisciplinary tumor board, whereas the lowest score was for the use of immunonutrition. Regarding intra-operative items, hypothermia prevention and the use of goal-directed fluid therapy and volatile anesthesia were diffusely adopted, whereas the rate of using abdominal drains was high. Regarding post-operative items, nausea prevention, multimodal analgesia and early mobilization were applied frequently, whereas the use of nasogastric tubes and regular transfer to intensive care units was diffused. The primary barriers in enhanced recovery after surgery protocol application were resistance and a lack of paramedic personnel. This survey's results highlight the efforts undertaken by several centers to apply enhanced recovery after surgery philosophy and in this regard, demonstrate a good standing in Italy.

Indexed as

Enhanced Recovery After SurgeryPerioperative CareSurveys and QuestionnairesEsophagectomyEsophagusHumansItalyMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresSurgery Department, HospitalEnhanced recovery after surgeryEsophageal surgeryEsophagectomySurvey

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.