Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33439465›Full record

ArticleNetherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation2021

Clinical profile and contemporary management of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: results from the CHECK-HF registry.

A Uijl, J F Veenis, H P Brunner-La Rocca, V van Empel, G C M Linssen, F W Asselbergs, C van der Lee, L W M Eurlings, H Kragten, N Y Y Al-Windy and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Tracing triggers of cardiac remodelling and heart failure.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

A UijlJulius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J F VeenisDepartment of Cardiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Thoraxcenter, Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. j.veenis@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7234-8266
H P Brunner-La RoccaHeart and Vascular Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
V van EmpelHeart and Vascular Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
G C M LinssenDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital Group Twente, Almelo and Hengelo, Almelo, The Netherlands.
F W AsselbergsDepartment of Cardiology, Division Heart and Lungs, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
C van der LeeStreekziekenhuis Koningin Beatrix, Winterswijk, The Netherlands.
L W M EurlingsVieCuri Medisch Centrum, Venlo, The Netherlands.
H KragtenZuyderland Medisch Centrum, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
N Y Y Al-WindyGelre Ziekenhuizen, Zutphen, The Netherlands.
A van der SpankFlevoziekenhuis, Almere, The Netherlands.
S KoudstaalDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
J J BrugtsDepartment of Cardiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Thoraxcenter, Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
A W HoesJulius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical management of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) centres on treating comorbidities and is likely to vary between countries. Thus, to provide insight into the current management of HFpEF, studies from multiple countries are required. We evaluated the clinical profiles and current management of patients with HFpEF in the Netherlands.

methodsWe included 2153 patients with HFpEF (defined as a left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 50%) from the CHECK-HF registry, which included patients from 2013 to 2016.

resultsMedian age was 77 (IQR 15) years, 55% were women and the most frequent comorbidities were hypertension (51%), renal insufficiency (45%) and atrial fibrillation (AF, 38%). Patients between 65 and 80 years and those over 80 years had on average more comorbidities (up to 64% and 74%, respectively, with two or more comorbidities) than patients younger than 65 years (38% with two or more comorbidities, p-value < 0.001). Although no specific drugs are available for HFpEF, treating comorbidities is advised. Beta-blockers were most frequently prescribed (78%), followed by loop diuretics (74%), renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors (67%) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs, 39%). Strongest predictors for loop-diuretic use were older age, higher New York Heart Association class and AF.

conclusionThe medical HFpEF profile is determined by the underlying comorbidities, sex and age. Comorbidities are highly prevalent in HFpEF patients, especially in elderly HFpEF patients. Despite the lack of evidence, many HFpEF patients receive regular beta-blockers, RAS inhibitors and MRAs, often for the treatment of comorbidities.

Indexed as

ComorbiditiesHeart failure with preserved ejection fractionHFpEFTreatment

Identifiers

PMID33439465
PMCPMC8271056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.