ArticleInterdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences2021
Differential Network Analysis Reveals Regulatory Patterns in Neural Stem Cell Fate Decision.
Article in Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nrsn1-Smarcc1 Coupling Regulates Neural Stem Cell Differentiation and Chronic-phase Recovery After Ischemic Stroke.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Screening and identification of hub gene and differential gene and mutation sequence analysis of related genes in colorectal cancer based on bioinformatics analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deciphering regulatory patterns of neural stem cell (NSC) differentiation with multiple stages is essential to understand NSC differentiation mechanisms. Recent single-cell transcriptome datasets became available at individual differentiation. However, a systematic and integrative analysis of multiple datasets at multiple temporal stages of NSC differentiation is lacking. In this study, we propose a new method integrating prior information to construct three gene regulatory networks at pair-wise stages of transcriptome and apply this method to investigate five NSC differentiation paths on four different single-cell transcriptome datasets. By constructing gene regulatory networks for each path, we delineate their regulatory patterns via differential topology and network diffusion analyses. We find 12 common differentially expressed genes among the five NSC differentiation paths, with one common regulatory pattern (Gsk3b_App_Cdk5) shared by all paths. The identified regulatory pattern, partly supported by previous experimental evidence, is essential to all differentiation paths, but it plays a different role in each path when regulating other genes. Together, our integrative analysis provides both common and specific regulatory mechanisms for each of the five NSC differentiation paths.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33439459What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.