Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33439454›Full record

ReviewCardiovascular intervention and therapeutics2021

Drug-eluting stent thrombosis: current and future perspectives.

Shoichi Kuramitsu, Shinjo Sonoda, Kenji Ando, Hiromasa Otake, Masahiro Natsuaki, Reo Anai, Yasuhiro Honda, Kazushige Kadota, Yoshio Kobayashi, Takeshi Kimura

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
13.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Drug-Coated Balloon vs. Stent forFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Coronary artery bypass graftingJournal of thoracic disease · 2024
    Article
  20. FeMaterials today. Bio · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Shoichi KuramitsuDepartment of Cardiology, Kokura Memorial Hospital, 3-2-1 Asano, Kokurakita-ku, Kitakyushu, 802-8555, Japan. kuramitsu@circulation.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9927-9686
Shinjo SonodaSecond Department of Internal Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan School of Medicine, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Kenji AndoDepartment of Cardiology, Kokura Memorial Hospital, 3-2-1 Asano, Kokurakita-ku, Kitakyushu, 802-8555, Japan.
Hiromasa OtakeDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduates School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Masahiro NatsuakiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan.
Reo AnaiSecond Department of Internal Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan School of Medicine, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Yasuhiro HondaDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA.
Kazushige KadotaDepartment of Cardiology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Kurashiki, Japan.
Yoshio KobayashiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.
Takeshi KimuraDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Kokura Memorial Hospital · JPUniversity of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan · JPChiba University · JPKobe University · JPKurashiki Central Hospital · JPKyoto University · JPSaga University · JPStanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past 40 years, the safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention has dramatically improved by overcoming several challenges. The introduction of drug-eluting stent (DES) in particular was a major breakthrough in interventional cardiology. Compared to bare-metal stents, first-generation DES (G1-DES) has dramatically reduced the rates of in-stent restenosis and subsequent target lesion revascularization. However, major safety concerns surrounding stent thrombosis (ST) emerged with G1-DES in clinical practice as a result of the high incidences of death, myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization associated with ST. To overcome these limitations, second-generation DES (G2-DES) has been developed with an improved stent platform with thinner strut and biocompatible durable or biodegradable polymers. Indeed, G2-DES, when compared with G1-DES, has improved clinical outcomes by reducing the risk of late thrombotic events while maintaining anti-restenotic efficacy, whereas ST still occurs, even with the use of G2-DES. This review gives an overview of pathophysiology, risk factors, and outcomes of ST after DES implantation. Additionally, we discuss the management and prevention of ST.

Indexed as

Coronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary ThrombosisDrug-Eluting StentsFemaleHumansPercutaneous Coronary InterventionProsthesis FailureRisk FactorsDrug-eluting stentPercutaneous coronary interventionStent thrombosis

Identifiers

PMID33439454
OpenAlexW3118279828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.