ArticleActa neurologica Belgica2021
Ophthalmologic manifestations in myasthenia gravis: presentation and prognosis.
Article in Acta neurologica Belgica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comprehensive bioinformatics analysis of metabolism‑related microRNAs in high myopia in young and old adults with age‑related cataracts.Molecular medicine reports · 2025Article
- Prognostic predictors of remission in ocular myasthenia gravis.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2023Article
- Clinical Efficacy of Immunoglobulin Combined with Glucocorticoids in the Treatment of Oculomotor Myasthenia Gravis in Children and the Effect on Serum Immunity.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We investigated the ophthalmologic manifestations and factors that influence outcomes in patients with myasthenia gravis (MG). We retrospectively analyzed the prevalence of neuro-ophthalmologic findings and clinical and outcome measures of 100 consecutive patients (53 males, 47 females), aged 55.7 ± 17.5 (range 15-85) years with an established diagnosis of MG. Forty-eight patients had purely ocular symptoms at the onset of disease (OMG) and 52 patients presented with generalized symptoms (GMG). Overall, 21 patients presented with extraocular muscle (EOM) weakness. Bilateral EOM weakness was seen in 12 patients, and unilateral EOM weakness was seen in nine patients. Diplopia responded partially to immunosuppressive treatments in 60% of patients with ophthalmoparesis. Twenty-five (52.1%) patients with ocular-onset MG converted to secondary GMG at a mean time of 14.5 months. Patients who developed secondary GMG were younger and had an earlier age of disease onset when compared with patients with pure OMG (p < 0.05). Patients with secondary GMG presented more frequently with ptosis and diplopia (72% vs. 28%) compared with patients with pure ocular MG who presented more frequently with isolated ptosis (66.7% vs. 33.3%) (p = 0.02). Remission and minimal manifestation status were achieved in 50 (79.3%) of all patients with a clinical follow-up ≥ 3 years. Poor outcome was associated with the presence of thymoma (p < 0.05). Myasthenic ophthalmoparesis is bilateral and heterogeneous and partly responds to treatment with immunotherapy. Younger patients with ptosis and diplopia at disease onset had an increased risk of secondary GMG. The presence of thymoma increases the risk for poor prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.