Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33439420›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2021

Concordance of the 21-gene assay between core needle biopsy and resection specimens in early breast cancer patients.

Peng Qi, Yu Yang, Qian-Ming Bai, Tian Xue, Min Ren, Qian-Lan Yao, Wen-Tao Yang, Xiao-Yan Zhou

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peng QiDepartment of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, No. 270 Dong An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5048-9604
Yu YangDepartment of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, No. 270 Dong An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Qian-Ming BaiDepartment of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, No. 270 Dong An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Tian XueDepartment of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, No. 270 Dong An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Min RenDepartment of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, No. 270 Dong An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Qian-Lan YaoDepartment of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, No. 270 Dong An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Wen-Tao YangDepartment of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, No. 270 Dong An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Xiao-Yan ZhouDepartment of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, No. 270 Dong An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China. 13524324387@163.com.
Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81470353National Natural Science Foundation of China 81502429National Natural Science Foundation of China 81870155Shanghai Municipal Health Bureau 2019CXJQ03Shanghai Municipal Health Bureau shslczdzk01301Shanghai Science and Technology Development Foundation 18ZR1407600Shanghai Science and Technology Development Foundation 19MC1911000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdjuvant therapy decisions may be partly based on the results of a multigene quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-based assay: the 21-gene recurrence score (RS) test of resection specimens. When necessary, core needle biopsy (CNB) may be considered as a surrogate. Here, we evaluated the concordance in gene expression according to results from RT-PCR-based RS testing between paired CNBs and resection specimens.

methodsCNBs and resection specimens from 50 breast cancer (BC) patients were tested to calculate RSs. First, we examined the concordance of the ER, PR and HER-2 status of tissue samples indicated by immunohistochemical (IHC) and RT-PCR analyses. Then, we compared the IHC findings of ER, PR, HER-2 and Ki-67 staining across paired samples. Ultimately, the RS and single-gene results for ER, PR, HER-2 and Ki-67 were explored between paired samples.

resultsThe concordance between IHC and RT-PCR was 100%, 80.0% and 100% for ER, PR and HER-2, respectively, in both resection specimens and CNBs. The concordance for IHC ER, PR, HER-2 and Ki-67 status was 100%, 94.0%, 52.0% and 82.0%, respectively, between paired samples. RS results from paired samples showed a strong correlation. The overall concordance in RS group classification between samples was 74%, 72% and 78% based on traditional cutoffs, TAILORx cutoffs and ASCO guidelines, respectively. ER, PR, HER-2 and Ki-67 were modestly- to- strongly correlated between paired samples according to the RT-PCR results.

conclusionA modest- to- strong correlation of ER, PR, HER-2 and Ki-67 gene expression and RS between CNBs and resection specimens was observed in the present study. The 21-gene RS test could be reliably performed on CNBs. ER, PR and HER-2 status showed remarkable concordance between the IHC and RT-PCR analyses. The concordance between paired samples was high for the IHC ER, PR and Ki-67 results and low for HER-2.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorBiopsy, Large-Core NeedleErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneBiomarkers, TumorErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneBreast cancerCore needle biopsyGenomic profilingPredictive biomarkersResection specimen

Identifiers

PMID33439420
PMCPMC7804587
OpenAlexW3118397876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.