ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2021
Impact of combining vancomycin with piperacillin/tazobactam or with meropenem on vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity.
Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between concomitant use of vancomycin-piperacillin/tazobactam and acute kidney injury in real-world setting.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Pooled it
- Evaluating the risk of acute kidney injury and mortality associated with concomitant use of vancomycin with piperacillin/tazobactam or meropenem in critically ill and non-critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Pooled it
- Risk factors for acute kidney injury associated with intravenous vancomycin in neurosurgical inpatients: a retrospective study.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2024Article
- Assessment of knowledge, attitude, and practices of acute kidney injury incidence with co-administration of piperacillin/tazobactam and vancomycin among healthcare workers: A cross-sectional study.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2023Article
- Review
- Piperacillin-Tazobactam Plus Vancomycin-Associated Acute Kidney Injury in Adults: Can Teicoplanin or Other Antipseudomonal Beta-Lactams Be Remedies?Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Comparative Risk of Acute Kidney Injury Following Concurrent Administration of Vancomycin with Piperacillin/Tazobactam or Meropenem: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Nephrotoxicity and antibiotics.Internal and emergency medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vancomycin (VAN) is a broad-spectrum antibiotic against Gram-positive cocci used empirically with other broad-spectrum antibiotics, such as piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP), cefepime, or meropenem (MEM). Conflicting literature on the rates of acute kidney injury (AKI) of VAN with TZP is reported, and studies on AKI rate with MEM are limited. This study aimed to evaluate AKI rates in patients receiving VAN with either TZP or MEM. This was a retrospective cohort study of patients received either VAN-TZP or VAN-MEM for ≥ 72 h. Patients with a baseline serum creatinine (SCr) of ≥ 1.5 mg/dL were excluded. The primary outcome was rate of AKI as defined by the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines. SCr was recorded at baseline and 3-5 days post antibiotics initiation. 158 patients were included, 77 in the VAN-TZP group versus 81 in the VAN-MEM group. While the percentage of patients meeting AKI definition was numerically higher in the VAN-MEM group, the difference was not significant (10.4% vs. 21%; P = 0.07). As such, change in SCr was not significantly different between the two groups (- 7.4 vs. - 6.1%; P = 0.7). In-hospital mortality was higher in the VAN-MEM group (23.4% vs. 39.5%; P = 0.03) possibly because the majority of this group's patients were critically ill. This study showed that combining MEM with VAN did not offer the benefit of a lower rate of AKI compared with a combination with TZP. Therefore, patients with no risk factors for infections resistant to TZP can continue to receive TZP with VAN without risking AKI development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.