Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33439380›Full record

ArticleWiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)2022

[Clinical ethic consultations in longterm care in Upper Austria-5 years report of the Landesverband Hospiz Upper Austria].

Kurt Lenz, Helmut Mittendorfer, Helga Sterrer, Arbeitsgruppe klinische Ethikberatung des Landesverbandes Hospiz Oberösterreich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kurt LenzLandesverband Hospiz, Pfalzgasse 2, 4055, Pupping, Österreich. kurt.lenz@meduniwien.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2456-3188
Helmut Mittendorfer
Helga Sterrer
Arbeitsgruppe klinische Ethikberatung des Landesverbandes Hospiz Oberösterreich

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the unique nature of ethical issues in a longterm care setting, there is limited help in decision making for nursing home personnel. 2015 the Hospizverband of Upper Austria established a clinical ethic committee to help providing a good quality of decision making in nursing home. A consultation could be asked by the managing nurses of the longterm care institution, by the resident or by relatives of the nursing home residents. Since the start of the ethic committee 24 from 137 nursing homes in Upper Austria asked for a consultation. All consultations came from the personnel of the nursing homes. Beside the nursing team and 1-3 members of the ethic committee, in 75% of the consultations the physician was present. The most often discussed ethical issues were hospital admission (25%), conflicts with relatives of the residents, artificial nutrition (including PEG tube insertion and displacement) and use of restraints. The most underlying illness was dementia (50%). 20% of the residents were competent in their wishes, but none of the involved residents had a written precisely patient decree.

Indexed as

Ethics, ClinicalPhysiciansAustriaHumansNursing HomesReferral and ConsultationAdvanced directivesArtificial nutritionClinical ethic comiteeEthic consultationNursing home

Identifiers

PMID33439380
PMCPMC9038856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.