Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33439364›Full record

ArticleJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2021

Current use of anticholinergic medications in a large naturalistic sample of psychiatric patients.

Sermin Toto, Gudrun Hefner, Martina Hahn, Christoph Hiemke, Sibylle C Roll, Jan Wolff, Ansgar Klimke

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Factors associated with potential drug-drug interactions in psychiatric inpatients.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sermin TotoDepartment of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany. toto.sermin@mh-hannover.de.
Gudrun HefnerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Vitos Klinikum Hochtaunus, Friedrichsdorf, Germany.
Martina HahnPsychiatric Hospital, Vitos Klinik Eichberg, Eltville, Germany.
Christoph HiemkeDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Sibylle C RollPsychiatric Hospital, Vitos Klinik Eichberg, Eltville, Germany.
Jan WolffDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Ansgar KlimkeDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Vitos Klinikum Hochtaunus, Friedrichsdorf, Germany.
Vitos · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEUniversity Medical Center Freiburg · DEUniversity Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt 01VSF16009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the high number of psychotropic drugs with anticholinergic potential, patients taking psychotropic drugs are at high risk for anticholinergic adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The aim of this study was to analyze the prevalence and type of pharmacodynamic anticholinergic drug-drug interactions in psychiatric patients. The retrospective longitudinal analysis used data from a large pharmacovigilance study conducted in ten German psychiatric hospitals. Anticholinergic burden of drugs was defined as "strong" or "moderate" based on current literature. Number and type of anticholinergic drugs were assessed. In total, 27,396 patient cases (45.6% female) with a mean age of 47.3 ± 18.3 years were included. 17.4% (n = 4760) of patients were ≥ 64 years. 35.4% of the patients received between one and four anticholinergic drugs simultaneously. A combination of drugs with anticholinergic potential was detected in 1738 cases (6.3%). Most prescribed drugs were promethazine (n = 2996), olanzapine (n = 2561), biperiden (n = 1074), and doxepin (n = 963). Patients receiving anticholinergic combinations were younger (45.7 vs. 47.4 years, p < 0.01) and had a longer inpatient stay (median 18 vs. 26.5 days, p < 0.001). The prevalence of anticholinergic drug use in psychiatry is high. Further efforts need to focus on reducing the rate of anticholinergics and inappropriate medication especially in the elderly. Anticholinergic ADRs can be prevented by avoiding high-risk drug combinations. Replacing tricyclic antidepressants and first-generation antihistamines with drugs with lower anticholinergic potential and avoiding biperiden could reduce 59.3% of anticholinergic drug application.

Indexed as

Cholinergic AntagonistsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsAgedFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMalePsychotropic DrugsRetrospective StudiesCholinergic AntagonistsPsychotropic DrugsAdverse drug reactions (ADR)Anticholinergic burdenDrug–drug interactions (DDI)Drug safetyPharmacodynamicsPharmacovigilancePsychiatryPsychotropic drugs

Identifiers

PMID33439364
OpenAlexW3119343466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.