Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33439314›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2021

High-resolution MRI demonstrates signal abnormalities of the 3rd cranial nerve in giant cell arteritis patients with 3rd cranial nerve impairment.

Sandy Mournet, Thomas Sené, Frédérique Charbonneau, Guillaume Poillon, Catherine Vignal, Gaëlle Clavel, Kévin Zuber, Julien Savatovsky, Augustin Lecler

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Temporal Artery Vascular Diseases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sandy MournetDepartment of Neuroradiology, Foundation Adolphe de Rothschild Hospital, 29 rue Manin, 75019, Paris, France. sandy.mournet@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8501-9557
Thomas SenéDepartment of Internal Medicine, Foundation Adolphe de Rothschild Hospital, Paris, France.
Frédérique CharbonneauDepartment of Neuroradiology, Foundation Adolphe de Rothschild Hospital, 29 rue Manin, 75019, Paris, France.
Guillaume PoillonDepartment of Neuroradiology, Foundation Adolphe de Rothschild Hospital, 29 rue Manin, 75019, Paris, France.
Catherine VignalDepartment of Neuro-Ophthalmology, Foundation Adolphe de Rothschild Hospital, Paris, France.
Gaëlle ClavelDepartment of Internal Medicine, Foundation Adolphe de Rothschild Hospital, Paris, France.
Kévin ZuberDepartment of Clinical Research, Foundation Adolphe de Rothschild Hospital, Paris, France.
Julien SavatovskyDepartment of Neuroradiology, Foundation Adolphe de Rothschild Hospital, 29 rue Manin, 75019, Paris, France.
Augustin LeclerDepartment of Neuroradiology, Foundation Adolphe de Rothschild Hospital, 29 rue Manin, 75019, Paris, France.
Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the sensitivity and specificity of high-resolution (HR) MRI for detecting signal abnormalities of cranial nerves (CN) in giant cell arteritis (GCA) patients presenting with diplopia.

methodsThis IRB-approved retrospective single-center study included GCA patients who underwent 3-T HR MRI from December 2014 to January 2020. Two radiologists, blinded to all data, individually assessed for the presence of enhancement of the 3rd, 4th, and/or 6th CN on post-contrast HR imaging and high signal intensity on HR T2-WI, for signal abnormalities of extraocular muscles and the brainstem, and for inflammatory changes of the ophthalmic and extracranial arteries. A Fisher's exact test was used to compare patients with or without diplopia.

resultsIn total, 64 patients (42/64 (66%) women and 22/64 (34%) men, mean age 76.3 ± 8 years) were included. Of the 64 patients, 14 (21.9%) presented with diplopia. Third CN enhancement was detected in 7/8 (87.5%) patients with 3rd CN impairment, as compared to no patients with 4th or 6th CN impairment or to patients without diplopia (p < 0.001). Third CN abnormal high signal intensity on HR T2-WI was detected in 4/5 patients (80%) with 3rd CN impairment versus none of other patients (p < 0.001). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for detecting 3rd CN signal abnormalities were of 0.88, 1, 1, and 0.99 and 0.8, 1, 1, and 0.98 for post-contrast HR imaging and HR T2-WI, respectively.

conclusionsHR MRI had excellent diagnostic sensitivity and specificity when detecting signal abnormalities of the 3rd CN in GCA patients presenting with 3rd CN impairment. KEY POINTS: • Third cranial nerve enhancement was detected in all patients with 3rd cranial nerve impairment except for one with transient diplopia. • The "check mark sign" might be useful to identify 3rd cranial nerve signal abnormalities in the orbital apex. • No signal abnormalities of the 4th or 6th cranial nerves could be detected on high-resolution MRI.

Indexed as

Giant Cell ArteritisAgedAged, 80 and overCranial NervesFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleOculomotor MusclesRetrospective StudiesGiant cell arteritisMagnetic resonance imagingOculomotor nerve

Identifiers

PMID33439314
OpenAlexW3120349526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.