Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33439313›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2021

Automated segmentation of kidney and renal mass and automated detection of renal mass in CT urography using 3D U-Net-based deep convolutional neural network.

Zhiyong Lin, Yingpu Cui, Jia Liu, Zhaonan Sun, Shuai Ma, Xiaodong Zhang, Xiaoying Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Automated vs. manual segmentation for small renal mass imaging.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zhiyong LinDepartment of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, No.8, Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.
Yingpu CuiDepartment of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, No.8, Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.
Jia LiuDepartment of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, No.8, Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.
Zhaonan SunDepartment of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, No.8, Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.
Shuai MaDepartment of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, No.8, Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.
Xiaodong ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, No.8, Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.
Xiaoying WangDepartment of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, No.8, Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China. cjr.wangxiaoying@vip.163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6406-0895

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop a 3D U-Net-based deep learning model for automated segmentation of kidney and renal mass, and detection of renal mass in corticomedullary phase of computed tomography urography (CTU).

methodsData on 882 kidneys obtained from CTU data of 441 patients with renal mass were used to learn and evaluate the deep learning model. The CTU data of 35 patients with small renal tumors (diameter ≤ 1.5 cm) were used for additional testing. The ground truth data for the kidney, renal tumor, and cyst were manually annotated on corticomedullary phase images of CTU. The proposed segmentation model for kidney and renal mass was constructed based on a 3D U-Net. The segmentation accuracy was evaluated through the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). The volume of the maximum 3D volume of interest of renal tumor and cyst in the predicted segmentation by the model was used as an identification indicator, while the detection performance of the model was evaluated by the area under the receiver operation characteristic curve.

resultsThe proposed model showed a high accuracy in segmentation of kidney and renal tumor, with average DSC of 0.973 and 0.844, respectively. It performed moderately in the renal cyst segmentation, with an average DSC of 0.536 in the test set. Also, this model showed good performance in detecting renal tumor and cyst.

conclusionsThe proposed automated segmentation and detection model based on 3D U-Net shows promising results for the segmentation of kidney and renal tumor, and the detection of renal tumor and cyst. KEY POINTS: • The segmentation model based on 3D U-Net showed high accuracy in segmentation of kidney and renal neoplasm, and good detection performance of renal neoplasm and cyst in corticomedullary phase of CTU. • The segmentation model based on 3D U-Net is a fully automated aided diagnostic tool that could be used to reduce the workload of radiologists and improve the accuracy of diagnosis. • The segmentation model based on 3D U-Net would be helpful to provide quantitative information for diagnosis, treatment, surgical planning, etc.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedHumansKidneyNeural Networks, ComputerUrographyComputer-assisted diagnosisDeep learningKidneyRenal neoplasmTomography, X-ray computed

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.