ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2021
Health literacy and PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7 completion in urogynecology patients.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Application and clinical efficacy of comprehensive nursing intervention in pelvic floor and bladder function recovery post-cervical cancer surgery.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisOur objectives were to describe the health literacy (HL) of urogynecology patients, characterize women with and without adequate HL, and compare errors made on the PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7.
methodsEnglish-speaking women presenting to an academic urogynecology clinic in June-July 2018 were invited to complete questionnaires including the Newest Vital Sign™ (NVS), the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-Short Form 20 (PFDI-20), and the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-Short Form 7 (PFIQ-7). An NVS score > 4 indicated adequate HL. Descriptive analyses compared women with and without adequate HL and the rates and types of errors made on the PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7.
resultsThe mean age of participants (N = 115) was 65 + 15 years; 87% were white/Caucasian; 62% were college-educated. NVS scores indicated likely adequate HL in 61%. Participants at risk for limited HL (39%) were older, less educated, more likely to live alone, and more likely to require assistance to manage their healthcare (all p < 0.05). Those requesting help to complete the questionnaires (29%) had lower HL. Errors occurred more often on the PFDI-20 (44%) than PFIQ-7 (5%) regardless of HL status. Those who received help were less likely to make errors on the PFDI-20 (p < 0.05).
conclusionsOverall 39% of patients were at risk for limited HL. Older age, living alone, less education, and requiring assistance to manage healthcare increased risk of limited HL. Errors were more common on the PFDI-20 than PFIQ-7 regardless of HL status and occurred even when participants received help completing the questionnaires, though less frequently.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33439283What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.