ArticleJournal of vision2021
Saccadic adaptation in the presence of artificial central scotomas.
Article in Journal of vision, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A method for measuring closed-loop latency in gaze-contingent rendering without extra equipment.Behavior research methods · 2025Article
- Efficient versus inefficient visual search as training for saccadic re-referencing to an extrafoveal location.Journal of vision · 2023Article
- A gaze-contingent saccadic re-referencing training with simulated central vision loss.Journal of vision · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Saccadic adaptation can occur over a short period of time through a constant adjustment of the saccade target during the saccade, resulting in saccadic re-referencing, which directs the saccade to a location different from the target that elicited the saccade. Saccade re-referencing could be used to help patients with age-related macular degeneration to optimally use their residual visual function. However, it remains unknown whether saccade adaptation can take place in the presence of central scotomas (i.e., without central vision). We tested participants in two experiments in a conventional double-step paradigm with a central gaze-contingent artificial scotoma. Experiment 1 (N = 12) comprised a backward adaptation paradigm with no scotoma control, visible, and invisible 3° diameter scotoma conditions. Experiment 2 (N = 13) comprised a forward adaptation paradigm with no scotoma control, invisible 2°, and 4° diameter scotoma conditions. In Experiment 1, we observed significant adaptation in both the visible and invisible scotoma conditions comparable to the control condition with no scotoma. This was the case even when the saccade landed such that the target was occluded by the scotoma. We observed that adaptation occurred based on peripheral viewing of the stepped target during the deceleration period. In Experiment 2, we found that both scotoma conditions showed adaptation again comparable to the control condition with no scotoma. We conclude that saccadic adaptation can occur with central scotomas, showing that it does not require central vision and can be driven primarily by peripheral retinal error.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.