Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33439136›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2021

Mobile Phone Access and Implications for Digital Health Interventions Among Adolescents and Young Adults in Zimbabwe: Cross-Sectional Survey.

Aoife M Doyle, Tsitsi Bandason, Ethel Dauya, Grace McHugh, Chris Grundy, Stefanie Dringus, Chido Dziva Chikwari, Rashida A Ferrand

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06415357 (Adapting mHealth Interventions to Improve Self-management of HIV and Substance Use Among Emerging Adults in Zambia), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06415357 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Adapting mHealth Interventions to Improve Self-management of HIV and Substance Use Among Emerging Adults in Zambia

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Massachusetts, WorcesterRan2024 to 2026Enrolled164ConditionsPre-Exposure ProphylaxisArmsMobile Healthy Choices (mHC), Motivational Text Messaging (MTM), Standard ART Counseling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. [Digital health literacy in Germany: current status, concepts, and challenges].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Aoife M DoyleMRC International Statistics and Epidemiology Group, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3305-7738
Tsitsi BandasonBiomedial Resarch and Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID 0000-0003-0066-8345
Ethel DauyaBiomedial Resarch and Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID 0000-0003-3241-2512
Grace McHughBiomedial Resarch and Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID 0000-0001-8569-1602
Chris GrundyMRC International Statistics and Epidemiology Group, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7042-2394
Stefanie DringusMRC International Statistics and Epidemiology Group, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1589-9250
Chido Dziva ChikwariMRC International Statistics and Epidemiology Group, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1617-3603
Rashida A FerrandBiomedial Resarch and Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID 0000-0002-7660-9176
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBBiomedical Research and Training Institute · ZW

Funding

Medical Research Council G0700837Medical Research Council MC_UU_12023/29Medical Research Council MR/K012126/1Medical Research Council MR/R010161/1Medical Research Council MR/V020641/1Wellcome Trust 206316/Z/17/ZWellcome Trust 206316Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMobile phones may help young people (YP) access health information and support health service engagement. However, in low-income settings there is limited knowledge on YP's phone and internet access to inform the feasibility of implementing digital health interventions.

objectiveWe investigated access to information and communication technologies among adolescents and young adults in Zimbabwe.

methodsA cross-sectional population-based survey was conducted from October to December 2018 among YP aged 13-24 years in 5 communities in urban and peri-urban Harare and Mashonaland East, Zimbabwe. Consenting YP completed a self-completed tablet-based questionnaire on mobile phone ownership and use, and use of the internet. The primary outcome was the proportion who reported owning a mobile phone. Secondary outcomes included phone and internet access and use behavior, and ownership and use of other technological devices. Multivariable logistic regression was used to investigate factors associated with mobile phone ownership and with internet access, with adjustment for the one-stage cluster sampling design. A priori exploratory variables were age, sex, marital status, and urban/peri-urban residence.

resultsA total of 634/719 (88.2%) eligible YP, mean age 18.0 years (SD 3.3) and 62.6% (397/634) females, participated. Of the YP interviewed, 62.6% (396/633; 95% CI 58.5-66.5) reported owning a phone and a further 4.3% (27/633) reported having access to a shared phone. Phone ownership increased with age: 27.0% (43/159) of 13-15-year olds, 61.0% (72/118) of 16-17-year olds, 71.5% (103/144) of 18-19-year olds, and 84.7% (171/202) of 20-24-year olds (odds ratio [OR] 1.4, 95% CI 1.3-1.5) per year increase. Ownership was similar among females and males: 61.0% (236/387; 95% CI 55.6-66.1) versus 64.8% (153/236; 95% CI 57.8-71.2), age-adjusted OR 0.7 (95% CI 0.5-1.1); higher in those with secondary level education compared to primary or no education: 67.1% (346/516; 95% CI 62.6-71.2) versus 26% (21/82; 95% CI 16.4-37.7), age-adjusted OR 2.3 (95% CI 1.1-4.8); and similar across other sociodemographic factors. YP reported that 85.3% (361/423) of phones, either owned or shared, were smartphones. Among phone owners, the most commonly used phone app was WhatsApp (71.2%, 282/396), and 16.4% (65/396) reported having ever used their phone to track their health. A total of 407/631 (64.5%; 95% CI 60.3-68.5) currently had access to the internet (used in last 3 months on any device) with access increasing with age (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.2-1.3 per year increase). In age-adjusted analysis, internet access was higher among males, the unmarried, those with a higher level of education, phone owners, and those who had lived in the community for more than 1 year. The aspect of the internet that YP most disliked was unwanted sexual (29.2%, 136/465) and violent (13.1%, 61/465) content.

conclusionsMobile phone-based interventions may be feasible in this population; however, such interventions could increase inequity, especially if they require access to the internet. Internet-based interventions should consider potential risks for participants and incorporate skill-building sessions on safe internet and phone use.

Indexed as

Cell PhoneAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleOwnershipSmartphoneYoung AdultZimbabweadolescentcell phonescross-sectional studiesfemalehealth-related internet usehumansinternetmalemobile phonesafetysmartphonetechnologyyoung adultyoung peopleyoung personZimbabwe

Identifiers

PMID33439136
PMCPMC7840276
OpenAlexW3097627011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.