Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33439116›Full record

ArticleMicrobial genomics2021

Comparative genomics of

Emeli Månsson, Thor Bech Johannesen, Åsa Nilsdotter-Augustinsson, Bo Söderquist, Marc Stegger

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial genomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Active components ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. From colonizer to culprit: genomic and clinical insights into S. epidermidis from post-surgical endophthalmitis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Dissemination ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Emeli MånssonDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Microbiology, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Thor Bech JohannesenDepartment of Bacteria, Parasites and Fungi, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Åsa Nilsdotter-AugustinssonDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Linköping University, Norrköping, Sweden.
Bo SöderquistDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Microbiology, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Marc SteggerDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Microbiology, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Statens Serum Institut · DKLinköping University · SEÖrebro University · SEUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is increased awareness of the worldwide spread of specific epidemic multidrug-resistant (MDR) lineages of the human commensal

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialAgedAged, 80 and overComputational BiologyFemaleGene Transfer, HorizontalGenomicsHip ProsthesisHumansKnee ProsthesisMaleMiddle AgedPhylogenyStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus epidermidisSwedenantimicrobial resistanceGWASprosthetic-joint infectionSCCmecStaphylococcus epidermidis

Identifiers

PMID33439116
PMCPMC8208700
OpenAlexW3120882360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.