ReviewCurrent cardiology reviews2021
Atrial Conduction Disorders.
Review in Current cardiology reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical translation and engineering challenges of soft robotic cardiac sleeves for heart failure.Nature communications · 2026Review
- Factors Associated with Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure with Preserved and Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Real-World Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Morphology-based ECG criteria for identifying left-atrial low-voltage areas on voltage mapping: a diagnostic accuracy study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Shifting global landscape of BMI-related atrial fibrillation: a 50-year trend and projection analysis.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2025Article
- Short-term effect of low atrial septum pacing on new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with sinus node dysfunction a prospective randomized single-center study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
- Cardiac function and atrial conduction time in morbid obesity: Insights from an echocardiographic case-control study.Global cardiology science & practice · 2025Article
- Interatrial Block, Bayés Syndrome, Left Atrial Enlargement, and Atrial Failure.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- P-wave durations from automated electrocardiogram analysis to predict atrial fibrillation and mortality in heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2023Article
- Atrial cardiomyopathy: from cell to bedside.ESC heart failure · 2022Review
- Circulating Levels of Ferritin, RDW, PTLs as Predictive Biomarkers of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation Risk after Cardiac Surgery in Extracorporeal Circulation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- The Continued Value of the Surface ECG for the Diagnosis and Management of Conduction Disorders in the Era of Advanced Imaging Techniques.Current cardiology reviews · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atrial conduction disorders result from impaired propagation of cardiac impulses from the sinoatrial node through the atrial conduction pathways. Disorders affecting interatrial conduction alter P-wave characteristics on the surface electrocardiogram. A variety of P-wave indices reflecting derangements in atrial conduction have been described and have been associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) and stroke. Interatrial block (IAB) is the most well-known of the different P-wave indices and is important clinically due to its ability to predict patients who are at risk of the development of AF and other supraventricular tachycardias. P-Wave Axis is a measure of the net direction of atrial depolarization and is determined by calculating the net vector of the P-wave electrical activation in the six limb-leads using the hexaxial reference system. It has been associated with stroke and it has been proposed that this variable be added to the existing CHA2DS2-VASc score to create a P2-CHA2DS2-VASc score to improve stroke prediction. P-Terminal Force in V1 is thought to be an epiphenomenon of advanced atrial fibrotic disease and has been shown to be associated with a higher risk of death, cardiac death, and congestive heart failure as well as an increased risk of AF. P-wave Dispersion is defined as the difference between the shortest and longest P-wave duration recorded on multiple concurrent surface ECG leads on a standard 12-lead ECG and has also been associated with the development of AF and AF recurrence. Pwave voltage in lead I (PVL1) is thought to be an electrocardiographic representation of cardiac conductive properties and, therefore, the extent of atrial fibrosis relative to myocardial mass. Reduced PVL1 has been demonstrated to be associated with new-onset AF in patients with coronary artery disease and may be useful for predicting AF. Recently a risk score (the MVP risk score) has been developed using IAB and PVL1 to predict atrial fibrillation and has shown a good predictive ability to determine patients at high risk of developing atrial fibrillation. The MVP risk score is currently undergoing validation in other populations. This section reviews the different P-wave indices in-depth, reflecting atrial conduction abnormalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.