Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33438297›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroscience research2021

Post-training stimulation of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex impairs working memory training performance.

Jacky Au, Benjamin Katz, Austin Moon, Sheebani Talati, Tessa R Abagis, John Jonides, Susanne M Jaeggi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroscience research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Longitudinal indices of human cognition and brain structure.Journal of neuroscience research · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jacky AuSchool of Education, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
Benjamin KatzDepartment of Human Development and Family Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Austin MoonSchool of Education, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
Sheebani TalatiDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Tessa R AbagisDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
John JonidesDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Susanne M JaeggiSchool of Education, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6165-2526

Funding

NRSA Training CoreTL1TR001415 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI CAIOZZO, VINCENT JAMES, HEAD, ELIZABETH · 2015 to 2023
$4.2M
Working Memory Training in Older AdultsR01AG049006 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI JAEGGI, SUSANNE M · 2015 to 2018
$2.5M
Cognitive Training and Brain Plasticity - Towards an Understanding of Mediators and ModeratorsK02AG054665 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI JAEGGI, SUSANNE M · 2017 to 2021
$806k
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001415NIA NIH HHS K02 AG054665NIA NIH HHS R01 AG049006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research investigating transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to enhance cognitive training augments both our understanding of its long-term effects on cognitive plasticity as well as potential applications to strengthen cognitive interventions. Previous work has demonstrated enhancement of working memory training while applying concurrent tDCS to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). However, the optimal stimulation parameters are still unknown. For example, the timing of tDCS delivery has been shown to be an influential variable that can interact with task learning. In the present study, we used tDCS to target the right DLPFC while participants trained on a visuospatial working memory task. We sought to compare the relative efficacy of online stimulation delivered during training to offline stimulation delivered either immediately before or afterwards. We were unable to replicate previously demonstrated benefits of online stimulation; however, we did find evidence that offline stimulation delivered after training can actually be detrimental to training performance relative to sham. We interpret our results in light of evidence suggesting a role of the right DLPFC in promoting memory interference, and conclude that while tDCS may be a promising tool to influence the results of cognitive training, more research and an abundance of caution are needed before fully endorsing its use for cognitive enhancement. This work suggests that effects can vary substantially in magnitude and direction between studies, and may be heavily dependent on a variety of intervention protocol parameters such as the timing and location of stimulation delivery, about which our understanding is still nascent.

Indexed as

Dorsolateral Prefrontal CortexFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLearningMaleMemory, Short-TermTranscranial Direct Current StimulationYoung Adultcognitive trainingconsolidationmemory interferenceoffline tDCSonline tDCSstimulation timingtranscranial direct current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID33438297
PMCPMC8273206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.