Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33438166›Full record

ArticleAmbio2021

Convergences and divergences between scientific and Indigenous and Local Knowledge contribute to inform carnivore conservation.

Miquel Torrents-Ticó, Álvaro Fernández-Llamazares, Daniel Burgas, Mar Cabeza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Indigenous knowledge, forest landscape modeling, and the cumulative effects of environmental changes.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Traditional ecological knowledge for great ape conservation in Gabon.Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Building bridges between natural and social science disciplines: a standardized methodology to combine data on ecosystem quality trends.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Miquel Torrents-TicóGlobal Change and Conservation (GCC), Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 65, 00014, Helsinki, Finland. miquel.torrents-tico@helsinki.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6580-5016
Álvaro Fernández-LlamazaresGlobal Change and Conservation (GCC), Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 65, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
Daniel BurgasGlobal Change and Conservation (GCC), Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 65, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
Mar CabezaGlobal Change and Conservation (GCC), Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 65, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

Opetushallitus (FI) TM-17-10610
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is increasing recognition that diverse knowledge systems can work in mutually enriching ways and that Indigenous and Local Knowledge (ILK) can enhance biodiversity conservation. However, studies using scientific knowledge and ILK in a complementary manner, and acknowledging convergent and especially divergent insights have remained limited. In this study, we contrasted proxies of abundances and trends of threatened and conflict-prone carnivores (caracal, cheetah, jackal, lion, leopard, spotted hyaena, striped hyaena) derived separately from scientific knowledge and ILK. We conducted camera trapping, track surveys and semi-structured interviews with local pastoralists from northern Kenya. We found convergences highlighting the need for conservation action and divergences suggesting scientific ecological sampling limitations or underlying socio-psychological phenomena. Overall, our study shows that complementing scientific knowledge and ILK as separate sources of information and opening up space for discrepancies can enrich our understanding of the status and trends of carnivores, as well as recognizing human-carnivore relationships.

Indexed as

CarnivoraPantheraAnimalsBiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesHumansKenyaCamera trappingCarnivore conservationIndigenous and Local KnowledgeScientific knowledgeTrack survey

Identifiers

PMID33438166
PMCPMC8035381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.